Summary of this article
This article series traces the development of the Trinity theory through the centuries, commencing with the pre-Nicene fathers, through the tumultuous events of the fourth century and into the subsequent centuries.
This first article defines the Trinity and explains the conceptual and historical development of the Trinity theory. The first step and foundational principle of the Trinity theory is that Jesus is God as much as the Father is God. To reconcile this with the monotheism of the Bible, the next development was the concept that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are a single Being. But since there are differences between them, the thought was added that they are three different Persons within one single Being. However, Christ Jesus, indicated that He is subordinate to the Father. To solve this challenge, Trinitarians developed the thought that Jesus had both a human and a divine nature. In His human nature, He is limited, but in His divine nature, He knows all things.
These formulations of the relationship between the Father, Son and Holy Spirit were developed over a period of about 400 years.
The purpose of this article series is to trace the development of the Trinity theory through the centuries, commencing with the pre-Nicene fathers, through the tumultuous events of the fourth century and into the subsequent centuries.
In the year 325, the Council of Nicaea concluded that the Lord Jesus Christ has the same substance (homoousios) and is co-equal with the Father. The purpose of the first articles is to determine what Christians believed about Christ and the Trinity in the three centuries before Nicaea.
Matt Slick is a prominent Trinitarian apologist. To prove that Christians did believe in the Trinity during the first three centuries, his brief post, “Early Trinitarian Quotes,” provides a collection of proof-texts from prominent second and third centuries theologians.
Sean Finnegan—a Unitarian (believing that the Father alone is God)—responded to Slick’s article with an article titled Trinity before Nicaea. His purpose was to show that Christians in the first three centuries did not believe in the Trinity. He discussed Slick’s articles but added further quotes. Dr. Tuggy’s podcast 262 presents his response. Dr. Tuggy is a well know Socinian Unitarian, which means that he believes that Christ did not exist before His human birth.
The current article series analyzes the quotes from both these articles to determine what the Christian authors believed in the first three centuries about the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The purpose is not to determine whether those early Christians were correct in what they taught, but, rather, to understand whether the Nicene and later creeds were consistent with the teachings of the early Christians.
To simplify these articles, many of the quotes below are summarized. For the full quotes, refer to Finnegan’s article.
Slick’s definition of the Trinity, in summary, is as follows:
God is one, but is a Trinity of three distinct persons; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Each has a will and is self-aware, but they are not three beings. They consist of one substance. Each person is the one God and is eternal, equal to the others and equally powerful.
Jesus, as a man, has both a divine and human nature.
In this definition, “each person is the one God.” This means that God = the Father = the Son = the Holy Spirit. This sounds like Modalism, where the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are not three different Persons, but three modes of the same Being. But then Slick adds that they are “three distinct persons.” In Slick’s definition:
The three-ness of God is expressed as three separate wills and self-awareness.
The one-ness of God is expressed as a single substance, understood as a single Being.
HISTORICAL AND CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT
The conceptual progression and historical development of the Trinity theory can be described as follows:
JESUS IS GOD.
Based on the High Christological statements in the Bible, Trinitarians believe that Jesus is God as much as the Father is God. This was the main point of the Nicene Creed of the year 325, which identified the Son as “true God from true God.”
THREE PERSONS IN ONE BEING
This creed caused much dispute and controversy in the church for the next 50 years, for the Bible is clear that only one God exists (monotheism). Trinitarians, therefore, developed the concept that the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are a single Being; that together they are the one God of the Bible. However, since there are differences between the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, such as that the one is begotten and the other not, the thought developed that they are three different Persons within the one single Being. This concept was reflected in the writings of the Cappadocian Fathers, late in the 3-hundreds (fourth century).
The word Trinity has two possible meanings. With a lower case, “trinity” simply means a group of three. Some early Christians used the word in that sense. They did not yet differentiate between upper case and lower case letters, but that was the meaning they attached to the Greek and Latin equivalents of the word. But, today, we do differentiate between upper and lower case, and we use the word “Trinity,” with a capital “T,” as a proper name for the single Being who consists of three divine Persons.
But then, Christ Jesus, when He was on earth, did not know the day and hour of His return, and said that only the Father knows that. And in many other ways, He indicated that He is subordinate to the Father. For example, He was sent by the Father and the Father gave Him what to say and what to do.
Trinitarians, therefore, developed the thought that Jesus had both a human and a divine nature. In His human nature, He did not know the day or die hour, but in His divine nature, He knows all things. This “two natures” theory was articulated at the council of Chalcedon in 451.
The foundation on which the Trinity theory rests is, therefore, the conclusion that the Son is God as much as the Father is God is. Both the One Being/Three Persons and the dual nature theories simply are secondary attempts to reconcile the Bible with the conclusion that the Son is God.
The concepts in this section will be brought out in more clarity in the articles that will follow.
In the fifty years after Nicaea, that creed was rejected by most church leaders. Arianism was the main competitor for the Trinity theory and dominated the church until the year 380. Arianism is explained in a later article. In summary, Arianism argues that the Son is not equal to the Father, but was begotten by the Father before time and that God created all things through the Son. In other words, in the infinity beyond time, the Father was before the Son, but then we use the word “before” metaphorically.
The articles below discuss the Christologies of Polycarp, Justin Martyr, Ignatius of Antioch, Irenaeus (bishop of Lyons), Tertullian and Origen. Origen was the greatest and most influential Christian theologian before Augustine. The purpose is to evaluate the following aspects from the definition of the Trinity against their works:
1. The Son is God.
2. The three Persons are equal.
3. The Holy Spirit is self-aware.
4. The three Persons consist of one substance.
5. Jesus has both a divine and a human nature.
ARTICLES IN THIS SERIES
FIRST 300 YEARS
- Council of Nicaea – AD 325 – Constantine played a huge role.
- The Nicene Creed Interpreted – Is the Son equal to God?
- Fourth Century Arian period – after Nicaea, the church was dominated by Arian emperors.
- What did Arianism believe in the fourth century?
- Long Lines Creed – one of the creeds during the Arian period
- Death of Arianism – Emperor Theodosius =- AD 380
- The Western Roman Empire did not fall – it transformed.
- Why the Roman Empire fell
- The Fall of Rome proves Daniel as a true prophecy.
- Fifth century Arianism – The Germanic tribes were Arian.