What makes this commentary different?

I was interested in the prophecies from a young age.  For decades now I have, from time to time, studied them and wrote about them.  This remains my major “hobby” and a joy.

My approach was to study the texts of the prophecies in depth, rather than to read what other people wrote about the prophecies.  Before the time of the computer tools of today, I made long lists of where the same word or concept would appear in the prophecies, and read the text over and over.  In this way I developed a perspective on the prophecies that is somewhat independent of the standard views, and in some respects unique.  This in depth study of the text, in various translations, forms one of the pillars of my interpretation.

My understanding of God has been influenced by the people I listened to.  Due to a profoundly autistic daughter and other personal issues, I do not attend church much, but I do listen to many tapes and MP3s.  From this I have developed a view of God that is perfect and good in everything He does.  Everything He does is to the benefit of His creation because of His amazing love for His creation.

His highest creation is His intelligent beings, with the ability and with the freedom to choose between right and wrong, and that freedom is very important to God.  He will not use His infinite power to force their will, because to do so would be to destroy His highest creation.  He will not use fear to force His intelligent beings to conform to He will.  He is love, and He wants us to love Him, and love cannot be generated by fear.  That is why He is “absent” from the earth; namely to allow sinners to continue to do what they want to do, without fear.  That is why sin could develop right in His presence, namely because the first sinner knew that he has nothing to fear from God.

God wants us to love Him, and to love Him we must appreciate and understand Him.  Therefore, in the beauty of His creation, and in the infinite miracles that are incorporated into life of earth, but particularly through the illustration of Himself which we find in Jesus Christ, He left sufficient proof on earth of who and what He is, for those that want to believe.

In this way those that want to believe in a beautiful and wonderful God have sufficient proof for their faith, and those that do not want to believe because they want to serve themselves, are able to do so without fear.

But eventually God must make an end of sin.  He does not want the horrible destructive rebellion to persist for ever in the universe.  How can He make an end to sin but still allow people and angels to choose for or against Him, without fear?  Such thoughts have also been fundamental in my interpretations of the prophecies, and I believe the prophecies provide answers to questions such as:

  • Why did God, who hates sin, allow sin to develop?
  • Why did He allow sin to continue for 2000 years after the cross?  What is He still waiting for?
  • Why will a God, that loves His creatures, including His intelligent creatures that chose against Him, pour out His wrath on the people with the mark of the beast when there is no hope of saving them?
  • Why will God resurrect the lost at the end of the Millennium, just to devour them by fire?

Since I started this website, my work methods changed.  When I start a new topic, I search the web for good articles and websites from all schools of thought.  These articles are summarized, deleting statements that I do not agree with.  Sentences, paragraphs and thoughts from these articles are categorized into subject areas.  The subject areas are, one after the other, integrated into cohesive units, to the best of my ability.  The actual words of the original author are retained, and only adjusted where the language can be simplified or the thoughts clarified.

As I work on a topic over months, I listen to MP3s on the same topic whenever possible.  Through reading and listening I gain further insights.  The end result of my articles is sometimes very different from any of the authors whose words I used, and in certain instances rather unique.

In the end, after several months, I cannot tell where a particular thought or phrase came from.  I am very grateful for all that I have learned from various people, and I use their words where it explains my understanding well, but I do not provide quotes, except if it is to confirm something which I do not have the expertise to verify.  One reason for not providing quotes is that I do not justify my views on the basis of the views of other people.  From time to time I do give credit to the authors that I found particularly useful.

My purpose is to make complex stuff simple, and to make jewels, hidden in complex academic articles, available to ordinary people.  Having the benefit of a number of good and sometimes scholarly articles, taking what I believe is the best out of them, based on a fair knowledge of the text of the prophecies, and summarizing the main points in simple words, I strive to develop something that is of a high quality but easy to read.

I have not attended any Bible school.  My views have not merely been developed by learning what other people wrote, but on the basis of a personal in depth study of the books of Daniel and Revelation themselves, over a long period of time.  I read commentaries of perhaps all persuasions.  I am not an official of any denomination.  I am a member of a church, but, as I indicated above, I do not attend church regularly.  One reason is that I try to devote as much as possible time to these studies.  My conclusions are sufficiently different from the views of my own church that I am viewed by the church as slightly dangerous.  I am not paid for this work, nor do I strive for academic acceptance.  For these reasons I can claim that I am more independent than most.

But is there a need for another interpretation of Daniel and Revelation?  Commentaries of Daniel & Revelation can easily be categorized into the various schools of thought.  This is an indication of the fact that most Bible teachers have never studied Daniel and Revelation for themselves without preconceived assumptions, but teach what they have been taught.  Since I have spent most of my time on the text of the prophecies themselves, I am able to provide a different perspective on the prophecies, which perhaps justifies the existence of the commentary.

Many people would find this commentary complex, but Daniel and Revelation are not supposed to be easy.  They are designed in such a way that only God’s people would understand.  I am reminded of the statement in Daniel 12:10, referring to the prophecies of Daniel, that “none of the wicked will understand”.   I am not claiming that I am not wicked, or that I understand.  My point is that Daniel 12:10 contrasts the wicked with “those who have insight”.  In “the end of time; many will go back and forth, and knowledge will increase” (Daniel 12:4).  I am trying to argue that the study of the prophecies is important for God’s people.  To provide you with the final conclusions only will serve no purpose.  In the difficult times that I believe lie ahead, and that is described by Daniel and particularly Revelation, God’s people will be persecuted for their faith.  Unless they understand the issues, they will, due to all the pressure and threats of persecution, find it difficult to stand for what they believe.  An in depth study of Daniel and Revelation helps people to prepare for the end times.

My understanding of the prophecies is probably very limited.  When we one day enter the eternal school, I think we would be amazed at how little we understand of the prophecies today.  Even though I feel strongly that my views are superior to many other interpretations, I cannot claim that my interpretations are correct, or even that they really are superior.  I remain a frail human being.

I try never to insult people with different views.  When we stand before God, He is not going to ask us whether we understood Revelation correctly.  He is going to ask us whether we loved our enemies.  It we cannot even love people that also believe in a loving Creator, how are we to respond to God’s question?

This commentary is still under development.  There is a huge amount of material that must still be sifted and prepared for publication.

Andries van Niekerk, Cape Town, South Africa



Babylon, the mother of harlots


Mysterious Babylon—a harlot woman sitting on a scarlet beast (17:3)—is a key figure in the latter half of the book of Revelation.  Dispensationalists, generally, believe that Babylon is a LITERAL CITY that will dominate the nations of the world in the end-time.  Others believe that Babylon is THE WORLD with its allure and resistance to God.  In academic circles, where Revelation is not understood to be a prophecy of the future, Babylon is seen as a code name for ROME.  Others interpret Babylon as RELIGION, or the APOSTATE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, or ROMAN CATHOLICISM.  This article first discusses her characteristics, proposes an identification and then evaluates various alternative theories of her identity.


But first, where does the name Babylon come from?

Babylon is first found in Genesis 10. When Moses traces the descendants of Ham, he wrote:

Nimrod … became a mighty one on the earth … the beginning of his kingdom was Babel and Erech and Accad and Calneh, in the land of Shinar” (Gen. 10:8-10).

Genesis 11:3-4 records the rebellion of the people of Shinar against God’s plan. God’s command was to populate the whole world:

“God … said to them, ‘Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth'” (Gen 9:1).

The rebellion at Shinar defied this command:

“They said, ‘Come, let us build for ourselves a city, and a tower whose top will reach into heaven … otherwise we will be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth'” (Gen 11:4 NASB).

This was the first recorded attempt at world unity against God.  To scatter the people around the world, God judged this act with a confusion of tongues. Because of this, the city was called Babel, which means confusion.


Nimrod’s kingdom combined civil and religious authority.  Ancient records indicate that Nimrod had a wife named Semiramis who was the founder and first high priestess of the Babylonian mystery religion.  She gave birth to a son named Tammuz, whom she claimed was conceived miraculously. This son was considered to be the savior of his people and in effect was the first false Messiah—a counterfeit of God’s promise of a Savior (Gen. 3:15). This son was supposed to have been killed by a wild beast but was brought back to life.

The religious system of Semiramis had many secret rites in the worship of its idols.  Initiates were intoxicated to prepare them for what they would see, hear and do.  These rites involved consecrated male and female prostitution and the most sordid sexual immorality carried out in connection with its idolatrous worship.

This religious system, which began in Babel, became the mother and source of the pagan religions of the world.  As the cult spread from one location to another, the idol images varied, but they all contained one central theme, namely the worship of the goddess-mother (called “the queen of heaven”) and her child, in pictures and images of a mother with a child in her arms.


Babel was later called Babylon, located in the current Iraq, about 50 miles south of Baghdad on the Euphrates River.

Babylon is mentioned 260 times in Scripture; second only to Jerusalem. These two cities are always seen in opposition to each other.

Babylon’s greatest glory was during the time of the Chaldean king Nebuchadnezzar; 600 years before Christ.  To the Jews, Babylon was where they were exiled to under Nebuchadnezzar (Jer. 29:1), who invaded their land, destroyed the city of Jerusalem and its temple, and deported Judah’s king. After this point in history, there has not been a king from the line of David on the throne of David in Jerusalem. So historically, we see that Babylon begins as the place of man’s rebellion to gather the peoples of the world, but eventually, Babylon took the land away that promised by God to His people, the Israelites.


Revelation 17 and 18 repeatedly draw imagery from the descriptions in the Old Testament of Babylon and of its destruction (Jeremiah 50-51 and Isaiah 47). In both the OT and Revelation, Babylon:

Dwells on many waters (Jer. 51:13; Rev. 17:1, see also Ps. 137:1);
Boasts: “I sit as queen and am no widow, and will not see sorrow” (Rev. 18:7; Isa. 47:7-9);
Commits much sorcery and spells (Rev 18:23; Isa 47:7-9);
Has a gold cup, the contents of which make the people of the world drunk (Jer. 51:7; Rev. 17:3-4; 18:6); and
Is suddenly destroyed, on a single day (Jer. 51:8; Rev. 18:8; Jer. 51:30; Isa 47:7-9) by fire (Jer. 51:30; Rev. 17:16; 18:8), final (Jer. 50:39; Rev. 18:21), and deserved (Jer. 51:63-64; Rev. 18:21).

Another example, of the use by Revelation of Old Testament symbolism, is the angel that takes up a stone and throws it into the sea, saying, “Thus with violence the great city Babylon shall be thrown down, and shall not be found anymore” (Rev. 18:21). This is an intentional allusion to a similar prophetic enactment:

“When you arrive in Babylon … read all these words, then you shall say, ‘O LORD, You have spoken against this place to cut it off, so that none shall remain in it, neither man nor beast, but it shall be desolate forever.’ … when you have finished reading this book, that you shall tie a stone to it and throw it out into the Euphrates. Then you shall say, ‘Thus Babylon shall sink and not rise from the catastrophe that I will bring upon her. (Jer. 51:59-64)

Literal interpreters conclude from this use of the Old Testament in the description of future Babylon as proof that the predicted literal destruction is still future. However, Revelation also uses imagery from the description of another mighty OT city—Tire—to describe Babylon. Both Tire and Revelation’s Babylon are described as women with daughters (Ezekiel 26:6; Rev 17:5). The music of both Tire and Babylon will be silenced (Ezekiel 26:13; Rev 18:22). The princes of the sea will lament over both Tire and Babylon (Ezekiel 26:16; Rev 18:17-19), and cast dust on their heads (Ezek. 27:30; Rev 18:19) and say “Who is like” this city (Ezek. 27:32; Rev 18:18). Both Tire and Babylon of Revelation are wealthy (Ezek. 27:12, 18; Rev 18:12, 13), supporting trade via ships (Ezek. 27:9; Rev 18:19). The wealth of both Tire and Babylon enriched others (Ezek. 27:33; Rev 18:19). Both Tire and Babylon will cease to be forever (Ezek. 27:36; Rev 18:21).

Furthermore, Revelation itself indicates that the meaning of the imagery changes. For example the waters on which Babylon sits was the physical Euphrates in the OT. In Revelation it is explicitly defined as the peoples of the whole world (17:15). It therefore changed from something physical to a symbol. In the OT “sitting” simply means Babylon was built on the river. In Revelation the meaning of “sitting” becomes a symbol of a corrupting influence (17:2). Something physical becomes a symbol. In the OT it is said that Babylon “is fallen”, and by that is meant that it will surely physically fall. The same phrase is use in Revelation to indicate that it has already fallen spiritually, because it became a prison of evil spirits (18:2). In Jeremiah 51 Babylon is a gold cup in God’s hands. This symbol changes in Revelation to a gold cup in Babylon’s hands. The general principle is that language may be borrowed from the OT, but the meaning changes, and should therefore be understood symbolically.


The last eleven chapters of Revelation are very different from the first eleven. In Revelation 12 the Dragon is the aggressor. At first it tries to devour the Child Jesus (12:4). Then it wages war in heaven as Satan (12:7, 9). Then it returns his attention to the woman that gave birth to the Child and tries to sweep her away with a flood of water (12:15). Lastly it goes away to make war with her other children (12:17). In the first part of Revelation 13 the Beast from the sea appears on the scene (13:1), with the Dragon moving to the background (13:2). This Sea-beast overcomes God’s people for 42 months (13:5-7). It receives a fatal wound, but recovers (13:3). In the latter and main portion of Revelation 13 the Sea Beast moves into the background (13:12), when the image of the sea beast, established with the support of the false prophet, persecutes and kills the people who refuse the mark of the beast (13:15). Revelation 12 and 13 therefore present four persecuting forces; the Dragon, Beast, False Prophet and the Image of the Beast; all persecuting God’s people. Babylon is not mentioned at all in these two chapters, but she must be part of these four characters for two reasons. Firstly, while the evil foursome persecutes God’s people, Babylon is guilty of their blood:

“in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all who have been slain on the earth” (18:24).

Secondly, he third angel warns against the beast, its image, and its mark (14:9). This message will therefore be given while the image is putting the mark of the beast on people (13:16). It may therefore be fair to assume that all three angel messages are relevant to this massive and world-wide conflict. But we find a surprise mention of Babylon in 14:8, where the second angel announces her fall. It is surprising to find Babylon mentioned by the three angels because she has not been mentioned anywhere in Revelation 13. Again it is concluded that Babylon must be involved in the war in Revelation 13, being part of the other four evil characters.

The second time that Babylon is mentioned in Revelation is in 16:19, in the final and seventh plague, where she receives God’s “fierce wrath”. This is another surprise mention, because she was not mentioned in any of the prior plagues. The dragon, sea-beast, false prophet, the demon spirits coming out of their month (16:10, 13), and the kings of the whole world (16:14) were mentioned as aggressors, but then Babylon is punished. Again we must conclude that Babylon is part of these evil characters.

Another indication that Babylon is part of the trio of the Dragon, Beast and False Prophet is that they all deceive the peoples of the world. Babylon makes the nations “drunk” with “the wine of her immorality” (14:8; 17:2). The dragon “deceives the whole world” (12:9). The “whole earth was amazed and followed after the beast (from the sea)” (13:3). The false prophet “deceives those who dwell on the earth” (13:14).

However, Revelation 17 seems to indicate that Babylon is not part of the evil trio, and this needs to be explained. The Beast receives his “power and his throne and great authority” from the dragon (13:2) and makes the world to worship the dragon (13:4). The Beast and the dragon are therefore distinct from each other. The beast from the earth (the False Prophet–19:20) “makes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast” (13:12). The Beast and the False Prophet are therefore also distinct from each other. The harlot (Babylon) sits on a scarlet beast (17:3). Babylon is therefore distinct from the scarlet beast. If one assumes that the Sea Beast and the Scarlet Beast are the same, then Babylon is also distinct from Revelation 13’s Sea Beast. However, the Scarlet Beast is not the same as the Sea Beast. This is clear from the fact that the Sea Beast is in control and is worshiped by the whole earth (13:8) while the scarlet beast has an inferior role—the harlot rides the scarlet beast.  She reigns over it (17:18)

So what is the relationship between the two beasts? They clearly overlap in meaning, because they both have seven heads and ten horns. What then is their relationship? The Sea Beast is identified as the 11th horn of Daniel 7 (see the article on the seven headed beast of Revelation), and therefore as a specific entity, existing in a specific period. In contrast Babylon is represented as sitting on the seven heads, which are seven consecutive “kings” (17:10) or empires, which means that Babylon exists during each of the seven consecutive heads. In Revelation the number seven means “completeness” in terms of time. It may be understood as meaning “for the full period”. The seven heads may therefore be understood as all the kingdoms of human history, which would mean that Babylon also exists for all of human history.

However, most commentaries link the seven heads to seven specific empires, including Babylon, Mede-Persia and Greece. (Please refer to the article of the Seven Headed Beasts of Revelation.) This means that Babylon ruled over these empires as well. Babylon therefore cannot be limited to our time or to sometime in the future. Babylon, and the scarlet beast, on which she sits, therefore do not represent a specific entity that is limited to a specific time period, but symbolizes a general principle, namely the control of Babylon over the civil and political powers of the world in all generations. The Sea Beast is one application and example of this principle, and consists of both the scarlet beast and Babylon, during the period of the Sea Beast.

Furthermore, Revelation 17 reveals that Babylon sits on and reigns over the seven-headed beast (17:3, 18). Babylon is therefore the anti-God driving force behind the Beast power. In Revelation 13 the Beast is in charge, since all who dwell on the earth will worship him (13:8), but Revelation 17 reveals that it is really Babylon that is in charge.

The Beast and his Image are worshiped (14:9), but Revelation never says that Babylon or the False Prophet is worshiped.  Another link between Babylon and the False Prophet is what they do.  Babylon makes “all the nations drink of the wine of the passion of her immorality” (14:8).  Similarly the False Prophet performs signs (13:13) to deceive those who dwell on the earth (13:14).  Babylon is therefore comparable to the False Prophet, but they are not the same.  In the first place, the False Prophet comes into existence after the Sea Beast (13:11, 12), and is therefore also a specific entity exiting at a specific point in time, compared to Babylon which exists during all empires mentioned above.  Secondly, the False Prophet is destroyed at the return of Christ (19:20), while Babylon is destroyed earlier at the hands of the final and evil confederacy of kings (17:16; 16:19).

To explain this last point:  In the seventh plague Babylon receives the cup of the wine of God’s fierce wrath (16:19).  Then Revelation 17 and 18 provide background information to this event, explaining why she has to receive this penalty, and well as more detail about this event, such as that she is actually destroyed by the consortium of 10 kings (17:16) which is the final phase of the Beast power (17:11, 12).  Then in Revelation 19 the great multitude in heaven praises God for Babylon’s destruction.  Revelation 19 therefore continues from the seventh plague, with Revelation 17 and 18 being an interruption of the chronological flow.

The next scene—after the joy is heaven—is the return of Jesus to destroy His earthly enemies (19:11-20:3).  The seventh plague ends with the peoples of the world blaspheming God (16:21).  In contrast the return of Christ ends with the death of the lost multitude (19:21).  It therefore seems clear that the return of Jesus is not part of the seventh plague, but follows after the seventh plague.  Babylon is destroyed during the seventh plague, while the Beast and False Prophet are thrown into the lake of fire as part of the return of Jesus (19:20).  Therefore it is concluded that Babylon is first destroyed, and then later the Beast and the False Prophet.

16:19 refers to a great city that splits into three parts. The term “great city” (16:19) is only used of Babylon (Rev. 14:8; 17:18; 18:10, 16, 18, 21), but once also for the new Jerusalem (Rev. 21:10). But as the heavenly Jerusalem will never be destroyed (22:5), the “great city” in 16:19 is Babylon. Because Babylon splits into three parts some propose that Babylon consists of the Dragon, the Beast and the False Prophet. However, since the Beast and the False Prophet still exists after Babylon is destroyed, this cannot be true.


Babylon sits on “many waters” (17:1), which is explained as “peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues” (Rev. 17:15). This four-fold phrase, consisting of four words that essentially have the same meaning, signifies that this includes all peoples of the world. In Revelation the number 4 has the meaning of “the entire world” (7:1). It is therefore possible to conclude that Babylon is not the peoples of the world, and secondly that her influence is world-wide.  Her world-wide influence is also indicated by the fact that “the kings of the earth have committed fornication’ with her (17:2). None seems excluded. Another indication of this is that she is guilty for all the deaths of God’s people who died for their faith (Rev. 18:24 cf. Rev. 17:6).

This concept of Babylon sitting on many waters is borrowed from the Old Testament. The physical city Babylon was situated on the Euphrates River, supporting life in the city. This becomes a symbol in Revelation, and the meaning changes. The Euphrates becomes a symbol for the peoples of the world. “Sitting on” changes in meaning from “support” to “influence”, as is clear from the many comments in Revelation about the relationship between Babylon and the peoples of the world:

  • She deceived the nations (Rev. 18:23).
  • She makes them “drink of the wine of the passion of her immorality” (14:8; 18:3).
  • This wine which she makes the people drink makes them “drunk” (17:2).

Babylon therefore has some sort of corrupting and intoxicating influence on the people of the world so that the people cannot distinguish right from wrong. She leads the people away from the truth of God. She teaches corrupting delusions.


The harlot’s name is Babylon is, but this is not her real name because this name is described as a “mystery” (17:5). Her name is symbolically Babylon. Revelation also calls her “Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified” (11:8). (The term “great city” in 11:8 is always used for Babylon (17:18; 18:10, 16, 18, 19, 21; 16:19).) According to 11:8 these are “mystically” her names, which also emphasize that these are also symbolic names.

Because Babylon was one of Israel’s major enemies in the Old Testament, the name “Babylon” implies this entity is the enemy of God’s people. “Sodom” was a city of ill repute . It emphasizes the morally “fallen” condition of this enemy of God. Egypt was not a city, but a nation, being Israel’s first major enemy. The words “where also their Lord was crucified” can either refer to the city Jerusalem or the nation of Israel, but here mentioned as the killer of God’s people. (In Revelation the names “Jerusalem” and “Israel” are only used in a positive sense.) The “great city” (11:8) is therefore called by various names, each conveying a different characteristic. This argues against the popular interpretation of the city as an end time reconstructed physical city on the site of the ancient Babylon.


In addition to being to being a woman, Babylon is also a harlot (17:1), and the kings of the earth commit immorality with her (17:2; 18:3). Many commentaries conclude from this that the “harlot” symbol means that Babylon is a religious entity, but It is proposed here that this symbol (harlot), by itself, based on the background texts in the Old Testament, does not mean Babylon is a religious entity, but simply means that Babylon is sinful; to depart from the LORD, to murder, rebel, steal, accept bribes, chases after rewards. It means not to defend the orphan, or to listen to the widow’s plea or to do what the Lord commanded. See Appendix B for a discussion of the OT background texts.

Revelation never says that Babylon commits adultery, which might have implied that God is her husband. It only says that she is a harlot, and commits immorality. The symbol of a harlot by itself does not imply that she is a wife.

Babylon is the “mother of harlots and of the abominations of the earth” (Rev. 17:5). Babylon therefore is the source and origin of harlotry (spiritual idolatry) and abominations, which was passed on to her daughters. Long before the time of Nebuchadnezzar, Moses identified certain practices as abominations (Lev. 7:18; 11 cf. Deut. 18:9-12). Since the Harlot is the mother of the abominations of the earth, she must predate Moses. This supports the conclusion above that she exists for all human history.


Babylon is not some amorphous entity such as culture or “power of money” or “the world”, because she will be destroyed by the final confederacy of kings; the ten horns of the beast (17:16), which “are ten kings” (17:12).  For the kings to be able to destroy her, she must be something specific.


In Revelation there are two contrasting women.  Babylon is called a harlot (17:1, 3).  The pure woman is the bride and wife of Christ (19:7; 21:9), representing God’s people (2Co 11:2; Eph. 5:25-27), also called the “New Jerusalem” (21:10).

Babylon and the Bride are similar in many respects.  Both are woman, but simultaneously also cities (17:18; 21:9, 10).  Both are introduced by one of the angels that pour out the bowl plagues.  In both instances the angel approaches John with the invitation: “Come, I will show you” (17:1; 21:9).  In both instances John is carried “in the Spirit” to see her (17:3; 21:10).  Both are married:

  • Babylon says “I AM NOT A WIDOW” (18:7), which implies she is married.
  • The Bride is referred to as “the wife of the Lamb” (21:9).

Both are wealthy:

  • The harlot Babylon is arrayed in purple and scarlet, glittering with gold, jewels, and pearls (17:4; 18:16-17).
  • The Bride Jerusalem has “the glory of God, its radiance like a most rare jewel, like jasper, clear as crystal” (21:11).   “The city was pure gold, like clear glass” (21:18), and decorated with every kind of precious stone and pearls (21:18-21).)

But Babylon is also very different from the New Jerusalem.  Babylon is “the great harlot” (17:1); the immoral mother of “abominations” (17:2, 5; 18:2), a “dwelling place of demons” (18:2).  The New Jerusalem, on the other hand, is the faithful “Bride, the wife of the Lamb” (21:2, 9).  Nothing “unclean”, no “abomination” shall enter New Jerusalem (21:27; 22:3a).  It is “holy” (21:2, 10), “the dwelling of God” (21:3, 22).

The wars described in Revelation are essentially between these two women, because the one tries to kill the other (18:24).  One is persecuted, the other is the persecutor.  The harlot of Chapter 17 is the aggressor, drinking the blood of the saints (17:6).  Consequently, while Babylon will be judged, hated, consumed and  destroyed (Rev. 14:8; 16:19; 17:16; 18:17, 19; 19:1, 2) while the New Jerusalem will enter into the marriage supper of the Lamb (18:7), and exist for all eternity (Heb. 13:14; Rev. 22:5).

These demonstrate that Babylon is the very antithesis of the New Jerusalem.  The harlot Babylon is therefore the personification of that earthly city which is to be seen in contrast to the heavenly city—the New Jerusalem.  She is an earthly counterfeit bride of Christ—that heavenly city, which is His church.  This provides support for Babylon identification as false religion.

Further support for this identification is found in the following:

Babylon is not some general malignant force which accidentally also persecutes God’s people.  She is exclusively in opposition to God’s people, as indicated by her being drunk with blood of God’s people (17:6).  In Babylon “was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of all who have been slain on the earth” (18:24).  This declares her to be the enemy of God’s people, not just an enemy.  She persecutes and kills them.

Babylon is fallen (14:8; 18:2).  This is often understood as that she will one day fall, similar to how this term is used in the Old Testament (Isa. 21:9-10), but 18:2 adds “She has become a dwelling place of demons and a prison of every unclean spirit, and a prison of every unclean and hateful bird”.  This implies she was previously something better, and that her fallen state has to do with her immorality.  This is another instance of something that is meant physically in the OT, which becomes a symbol in Revelation.

John was greatly astonished when he saw the harlot (Rev 17:6).  He was in fact, “dumbfounded” or “greatly perplexed.”  What he saw was therefore much unexpected.  This is hard to follow if John had seen only the persecuting Roman Emperors or hostile leaders in Jerusalem or a literal end time city.  That was all familiar to his experience.  However, if he had seen the change that would take place in the institutional church of Christ, the apostolic church, that the pure woman would become intolerant and bloodthirsty, that would have been truly dumbfounding.

In Revelation 16 the plagues first fall on the followers of the Beast only (16:2).  They therefore become aware that they were deceived by the Beast powers.  Therefore the popular support for Babylon dries up, symbolized by the waters of Babylon (the Euphrates) drying up.  Then the eighth head of the beast—the final consortium of kings—forms in preparation for Armageddon (16:14, 16).  They then kill Babylon as the first phase of Armageddon (17:16).  The fact that Babylon is destroyed by the lost peoples of the world, when they realize that she deceived them, and they are consequently eternally lost, implies that her deception led them away from God, which implies her nature is religious.

Lastly, the letters to the churches contain many references to things that are mentioned later in Revelation, such as the tree of life (2:7), the second death (2:11), Satan’s throne (2:13), great tribulation (2:22) and the morning star (2:28).  It seems reasonable to assume that the anti-God forces in the letters are early forms of Babylon.  We can therefore conclude on the nature of Babylon from the nature of these anti-God forces.  When we study the letters we find that the anti-God forces are within the church, not outside of it:

In Ephesus the problem is “those who call themselves apostles, and they are not” (2:2).  This is consistent with ominous prediction by the apostle Paul when he addressed the church elders of Ephesus:

I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock.  Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them.  So be on your guard!  Acts 20:29-31

In Smyrna and Philadelphia the problem is “those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan” (2:9; 3:9).  Now why would non-Jews who pretend to be Jews particularly be the problem?  This should therefore not be read literally.  This should be understood consistent with the principle of the New Testament:

For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh.  But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God.  (Rom 2:28-29 NASB)

Understood this way, the non-Jews who call themselves Jews are people within the Church.

In Pergamum the problem is: “you have there some who hold the teaching of Balaam” (2:14).  Again the problem is within the Church, not a challenge from outside.

In Thyatira the challenge comes from “the woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and leads My bond-servants astray” (2:20).  In the history of Israel, Jezebel influenced her husband King Ahab to use civil force to promote the worship of Baal and to persecute Elijah and other followers of Yahweh; the political, legalized murder of the saints of God.  Jezebel therefore foreshadowed the reign of the harlot Babylon—the apocalyptic Jezebel—who will use the political rulers to persecute the followers of Christ.  As type of end time Babylon, Jezebel is not a foreign government, but the corrupting forces which developed among God’s covenant people.

The identification of Babylon as false religion is consistent with Babylon’s characteristics, as identified above:

  • not the peoples
  • world-wide
  • corrupting influence on the people of the world
  • Babylon not her real name
  • origin of harlotry and abominations
  • something specific which the kings can kill

False religion is what drives the dragon, beast and false prophet, and has as its main objective the destruction of God’s people.  It originated with Nimrod & Semiramis shortly after the flood, existed for all of human history, and became the source of all false religion—world-wide.  False religion is not the peoples of the world, but leads people away from the one true God.  The name Babylon serves as symbol of her false religion’s opposition to God’s people; it is not her real name.  It is something specific, which the kings can destroy, once they become aware that it deceived them.


Babylon is represented as sitting on a seven headed beast, explained as the rulers (kings) of the world (17:10, 12 and 18).  If Babylon is understood as Religion, sitting on the beast, then we have a picture of Religion controlling the political powers of the world.

Various astute rulers in the long history of human government, rightly estimating the tremendous power of religion over the minds of men, have been greatly intrigued with the idea of some kind of union between religion and state, in which the government would establish and support some widely accepted religion and this religion in turn would lend its influence to the state.  All such alliances thus humanly originated have been based on selfish motives and opportunist policies on both sides, and hence must always break down in the end.  A union between religion and state is safe only when inaugurated and controlled by the one true God in a kingdom of His own (Zech. 14:9, 14:16-21).

The national policy of complete separation of church and state, which most sensible people fully approve under present conditions, is not however the ideal policy. It is rather a policy of precaution in a sinful world, where political and ecclesiastical power too often gets into the wrong hands, and the result is intolerable oppression. But under the personal rule of the Messianic King the union of church and state will not only be safe; it will also be the highest possible good.


Revelation 17 describes Babylon’s relationship with kings and the inhabitants of the world (17:2).  Revelation adds a third group with whom Babylon has relations, namely merchants.  Babylon is the source of their wealth:

  • the merchants of the earth have become rich by the wealth of her sensuality (18:3)
  • The merchants of these things, who became rich from her (18:15)
  • all who had ships at sea became rich by her wealth (18:19)

When Babylon is destroyed, commerce will be simultaneously destroyed:

  • the merchants … mourn over her, because no one buys their cargoes any more (18:11)
  • all things that were luxurious and splendid have passed away from you (18:14)
  • for in one hour such great wealth has been laid waste! (18:17)

While Babylon the kings and the peoples are outside of Babylon, indicating by her sitting on them (17:3, 15), the merchants are part of her, indicated by the statement “your merchants” (18:23).

Some have therefore concluded that Babylon is mammon—wealth (Mat 6:24).  Wealth does fit some of Babylon’s characteristics, such as existence for all of human history, and being world-wide, but nowhere in the Bible is a woman used as a symbol for wealth.  Furthermore, how can it be said that the power of money is fundamentally opposed to God’s people, and the ultimate cause of all the prophets and saints that were ever “slain on the earth” (18:24)?  It is rather Jerusalem that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her (Mat 23:37).  How can it be said that the power of money received a fatal wound, but recovered (13:3)?  (Since Babylon rides the Beast, Babylon goes through the same period of relative incompetence.)  Why would the evil kings of the earth agree to join forces to destroy the power of money (17:16), and how could they?  What would constitute “immoral acts” between the power of money and the kings of the world (18:3)?

So, who are the merchants of Babylon?

One possible explanation is that it is simply highly figurative language which should not be interpreted.  Such an argument may be based on the fact that much of the merchant language in Revelation 18 comes from Ezekiel 27 and 28, where the destruction of Tyre is prophesied.  Tyre is also described as very wealthy, and the source of the wealth of her people (Ezek. 27:9, 33).  However, experience teaches that everything in Revelation is important, and that language from the Old Testament is ingeniously used to describe end time realities.

A second possibility is that they are literal merchants, but as explained elsewhere, Babylon is not a literal city.  Then it should follow that the merchants cannot be literal merchants.

To understand what “merchants” refer to, “wealth” needs to be understood better.  Is it literal wealth?  18:3 defines Babylon’s wealth as her “sensuality”.  It reads “the wealth of her sensuality”, not “the sensuality of her wealth”.  Her wealth is therefore not literal.  Furthermore, in the letters to the churches the concepts of poverty and wealth are used as symbols of spiritual condition:

‘I know your … your poverty (but you are rich) …  (Rev 2:9 NASB)

… you say, “I am rich, and have become wealthy, and have need of nothing,” and you do not know that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked, (Rev 3:17 NASB)

I advise you to buy from Me gold refined by fire so that you may become rich, and white garments so that you may clothe yourself, and that the shame of your nakedness will not be revealed; and eye salve to anoint your eyes so that you may see.  (Rev 3:18 NASB)

When Laodicea says they are rich, this arguably means that they see themselves as right with God; as spiritually wealthy.  When Jesus says they are poor, it means they are not right with God.  Wealth is therefore a symbol of spiritual condition.

A related concept that must be understood is “buying”.  In 3:18 Jesus is the Merchant.  He sells gold, white garments and eye salve.  Further­more, buying is used in Revelation as a symbol for salvation:

… no one could learn the song except the one hundred and forty-four thousand who had been purchased from the earth.  … These (the 144,000) have been purchased from among men as first fruits to God and to the Lamb.  (Rev 14:3, 4 NASB)

And they *sang a new song, saying, “Worthy are You to take the book and to break its seals; for You were slain, and purchased for God with Your blood men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation.  (Rev 5:9 NASB)

This brings us back to the merchants.  If “wealth” relates to spiritual condition, and “buying” symbolizes salvation, then the merchants must be preachers and pastors.

This is supported by 18:23, read with 6:16.  In 18:23 the merchants are explained as the “great men of the earth”.  The only other place in Revelation where the term “great men” (18:23) is used in the NASB, is in 6:15, where “great men” is distinguished from both the kings and “the rich”:

Then the kings of the earth and the great men and the commanders and the rich and the strong and every slave and free man hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains; (Rev 6:15 NASB)

The “great men” are therefore not the literally wealthy peoples of the world.  The interpretation of the merchants as preachers is further supported by the word “because” in 18:23, which implies that it is the merchants that deceive the nations:

… for your merchants were the great men of the earth, because all the nations were deceived by your sorcery.  (Rev 18:23 NASB)

Deceiving is what the devil does (12:9; 20:3, 8, 10), and also the false prophet (13:14; 19:20).  Deceiving, and therefore “merchants” could therefore appropriately be understood as Satan’s representatives, and therefore as the leaders of false religion.  They are the great men because they trade in the religious authority of the harlot, concluding agreements with the political authorities.  They are the religious office bearers that trade in false religion’s principles and doctrines: her leaders, preachers, ministers, priests, bishops, and so forth.

It is her wealth (sensuality) that attracts the political authorities to her because the political authorities desire to merge with religious authority to strengthen their control over the people.

The relationship between the kings and the harlot is immoral (18:3) because religion is supposed to have relationships with God only.

This immoral relationship intoxicates the people (18:3) because they submit more readily to the combined political and religious authority.

The statement “for in one hour such great wealth has been laid waste!” (18:17) refers to the destruction of religious authority, when the political powers of the world turn on Babylon to destroy her (17:16, cf. 16:19), after the peoples of the world withdrew their support from Babylon, symbolized by her water (the Euphrates) drying up, after the plagues fell on her followers only, and they realize they were deceived (16:2).


The question here is whether Babylon represents Christian religion or all religion.  The language in Revelation indicates it is all—Babylon sits on all peoples of the world (17:15).  However, there are indications that the end time conflict described by Revelation may be limited to the Christian world:

ONE: The fourth beast of Daniel 7 is the Roman Empire, and the horns on the fourth beast are the nations that were formed in Europe when that empire dissolved in the first centuries after Christ.  These nations then proceeded to occupy territory in many parts of the world, including the current USA.  The focus of the prophecies in the book of Daniel is therefore the nations that eventually became the Western World.  Since Revelation is built on Daniel, it is possible that the “whole world” in Revelation may be limited to the Western World, which may mean that Babylon refers to the religious systems particularly dominating the West.

TWO: More specifically, the prominent horn of Daniel 7 is identified as a Christian authority.  (See the discussion on Daniel 7.)  Further, this entity is the same as Revelation 13’s Sea Beast.  (See the discussion on the seven headed beasts of Revelation.)  The Land Beast then executes the authority of this Christian authority (13:12), which means that the land beast is also Christian.  And it is this land beast that convinces the people to erect an image to the sea beast (13:14).  Since the image is of the Sea Beast (13:14), and the Sea Beast is a Christian authority, the image is also Christian.  The Christian institution then gives the mark of the beast to the followers of the beast (13:15-16).

THREE: Persecution in Revelation 13 is individualized and selective of God’s real people.  It is not a nation or a race or a language that is persecuted, nor nominal Christian, but the individuals that refuse the mark of the beast (13:17).  Systems like Islam and atheism may target Christian nations or nominal Christians, but they are not able to specifically target God’s real people.  It is only Christian religions that are able to persecute God’s real people selectively.

FOUR: It is difficult to foresee a single world-wide religious movement which will be able to prescribe is laws in Eastern, Muslim, Jewish and Christian nations.

FIVE: The beast that creates the image to the beast (13:14) comes out of the earth (13:11).  In Revelation the earth and the sea represent the peoples of the earth (12:12), but the earth seems to be a positive or at least a neutral force, because it helps the woman (12:16), in contrast to the persecuting waters (12:16), which are the peoples and nations of the world (17:15).  The “earth” therefore represents either Christian nations or religious freedom.

SIX: The threat in the seven letters is from within the church.  The threats are “those who call themselves apostles, and they are not” (2:2), “those who say they are Jews and are not” (2:9), some people in the church “who … hold the teaching of the Nicolaitans” (2:15), “the woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess” (2:20), those “who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie” (3:9).

There therefore seem to be clear indications that the end time conflict is Christian in nature.

The modern ecumenical movement, active first among Protestant churches in the first half of the twentieth century, then essentially combining (or at least fellowshipping) with the Catholic and Orthodox churches in the second half of the twentieth century, is currently forming alliances with all other world religions.  This may result in one great world religion, but then it will still be dominated by the Christian entities—the Sea Beast and its image.

Does that mean that Babylon is also Christian, or can Babylon still refer to all the false religions of the world, including Islam, Hinduism and Atheism?  Since Babylon sits on all seven heads, and these heads include Babylon, Mede-Persia and Greece (see the article on the seven heads of the beast), Babylon cannot be limited to Christian Churches.  Furthermore, Babylon cannot be limited to the Church because she exists for all human history and is world-wide.  However, the end time conflict is a Christian one, being the dominant false religion.

Perhaps the reader wonders why Christianity is included with Babylon—false religion—in this commentary.  During the Middle Age and even today the Church in many countries has significant dealing with the state, and used the strong arm of government to achieve her goals, persecuting those that differ from her, and has therefore become part of Babylon.  Just as Israel killed the prophets and Christ, so the Church, according to historians, has killed millions of God’s people.  Therefore the Church can aptly be described as a daughter of the harlot Babylon.


The purpose of this appendix is simply to summarise all the characteristics of Babylon, as identified above.

Babylon is not the peoples of the world, but has a world-wide corrupting influence on the people of the world. Babylon is not her real name.  She is the origin of harlotry and abominations.  She controls the kingdoms of the world, and is something specific which the kings can kill.

Babylon is the earthly counterfeit bride, exclusively in opposition to God’s people, guilty of the blood of all saints ever killed.  She previously was something better, and her altered nature greatly astonished John.  She is destroyed by the lost peoples of the world, when they realise that she deceived them, which happens after the temple in heaven is closed, and also after the little horn arises.


What does the symbol “harlot” means?  The expression “play the harlot with the strange gods of the land” is used in the OT to refer to the worship of false gods (Ex. 34:15; Deut. 31:16; Jer. 3:6, 9) probably because prostitution was a standard part of heathen religious activities.  Most of the references in the OT to prostitution refer to the spiritual apostasy in idol worship of Israel or Jerusalem.  From this developed the use of harlotry to describe disloyalty to God in general.  Israel was a harlot to Egypt, Assyria and Chaldea:

Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying, ” … make known to Jerusalem … you grew up …  your breasts were formed … I also clothed you with embroidered cloth …  I adorned you with ornaments… so you were exceedingly beautiful … But you trusted in your beauty and played the harlot because of your fame … You also played the harlot with the Egyptians … you played the harlot with the Assyrians … You also multiplied your harlotry with the land of merchants, Chaldea … You adulteress wife, who takes strangers instead of her husband! Ezek. 16

Harlotry is something which Israel learned and did in Egypt:

‘Thus I will make your lewdness (filthiness) and your harlotry brought from the land of Egypt to cease from you, so that you will not lift up your eyes to them or remember Egypt anymore.’  (Ezek. 23:27NASB)

“Yet she multiplied her harlotries, remembering the days of her youth, when she played the harlot in the land of Egypt.  (Ezek. 23:19 NASB)

“She did not forsake her harlotries from the time in Egypt; for in her youth men had lain with her, and they handled her virgin bosom and poured out their lust on her.  (Ezek. 23:8 NASB)

The next group of texts is important because it defines harlotry is to sin against God:

… the LORD said to Hosea: ’Go, take yourself a wife of harlotry and children of harlotry, for the land has committed great harlotry by departing from the LORD.’ Hosea 1:2

My people consult their wooden idol, and their diviner’s wand informs them; For a spirit of harlotry has led them astray, And they have played the harlot, departing from their God.  (Hos 4:12 NASB)

… For you have played the harlot, forsaking your God. … (Hos 9:1 NASB)

How the faithful city has become a harlot, She who was full of justice! Righteousness once lodged in her, But now murderers.  … Your rulers are rebels And companions of thieves; Everyone loves a bribe And chases after rewards. They do not defend the orphan, Nor does the widow’s plea come before them.  (Isa 1:21-23 NASB)

… remember all the commandments of the LORD, so as to do them and not follow after your own heart and your own eyes, after which you played the harlot, (Num. 15:39 NASB)

To be a harlot with the kings of the earth means to learn and do the evil they do:

2:2 “… proclaim in the ears of Jerusalem.  … 18 “… what are you doing on the road to Egypt, To drink the waters of the Nile? [Interpreted here as to learn from the Egyptians] Or what are you doing on the road to Assyria, To drink the waters of the Euphrates?  … 20  … But you said, ‘I will not serve!‘ For on every high hill … You have lain down as a harlot. 21 Yet I planted you a choice vine, A completely faithful seed. … 25 But you said … I have loved strangers, And after them I will walk.’ 3:1  … you are a harlot with many lovers … 6 … “Have you seen what faithless Israel did? She went up on every high hill and under every green tree [this is where the places of idol worship were], and she was a harlot there [Israel participated in the rites of idol worship, which included prostitution].  7  … she did not return, and her treacherous sister Judah saw it.  8 … the adulteries of faithless Israel …  yet her treacherous sister Judah did not fear; but she went and was a harlot also.  20 Surely, as a woman treacherously departs from her lover, So you have dealt treacherously with Me, O house of Israel,” declares the LORD.  (Jeremiah 2-3)

In the Old Testament it is mostly Israel that is described as a harlot, but heathen city are also described as harlots:

all because of the wanton lust of a harlot, alluring, the mistress of sorceries, who enslaved nations by her prostitution and peoples by her witchcraft. Nah 3:4 (Nineveh)

O prostitute forgotten (Tyre); play the harp well, sing many a song … Tyre.  She will return to her hire as a prostitute and will ply her trade with all the kingdoms on the face of the earth.  (Isa 23:15-17)

Based on these texts it is probably safe to limit the interpretation of the “harlot”-symbol as meaning to “depart from the LORD”, to murder, rebel, seal, accept bribes and chase after rewards.  It means not to defend the orphan, or listen to the widow’s plea or to do what the Lord commanded in general.


In Revelation 17 Babylon is a woman, drunk with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.  This emphasizes religious aspects.  In the last verse of chapter 17 (17:18) Babylon is defined as a city, and Revelation 18 continues to describe her as a city, emphasizing commercial aspects.  Due to this contrast some dispensationalists propose that the woman and the city are two distinct entities, with the Babylon of chapter 17 as dealing with an ecclesiastical or spiritual or religious entity, whereas Babylon of chapter 18 is a political entity or a commercial system.  Consequently they hold that the harlot and the city are judged separately.

One justification provided for this view is that, in the KJV of 17:5, the harlot’s name is “Mystery Babylon”, while the city’s name is simply “Babylon”.  The question as to whether the word “mystery” is part of her name cannot be settled by the underlying Greek.  But for the following reasons it seems best to understand the word mystery as describing the woman and not as part of her name:

ONE: In both 14:8 and in 17:2 she is described as the one who “made all the nations drink of the wine of the passion of her immorality”, but in 14:8 her name is simply “Babylon the Great”, not “Mystery, Babylon the Great”.

TWO: In the immediate context of the word “mystery” in 17:5, the angel offers to tell John “the mystery of the woman and of the beast which carries her” (17:7).   The mystery therefore extends beyond the woman herself to include the seven-headed beast with ten horns.

The woman and the city therefore have the same name, namely “Babylon”.  The first justification is therefore not valid.

Another justification for differentiation between the woman and the city is that the woman of chapter 17 is made desolate, naked, and burned with fire by the beast (17:16), whereas the fall of Babylon in chapter 18 is accomplished directly by God (cf. 16:19-21).  However, both are destroyed by God (Rev. 17:17; 18:5, 8) through fire (Rev. 17:16; 18:8-9, 18) and both will become an utter desolation (Rev. 17:16; 18:17, 19).  This second proposed distinction is therefore also not valid.

A third justification is that, according to 18:9, the kings of the earth as well as the merchants will all mourn the passing of the Babylon of chapter 18.  There is apparently no mourning after the destruction of the woman in chapter 17.  However, the following indicate that the harlot and the city are one and the same:

  • The Harlot is explicitly explained to be the city: “And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the earth” (Rev. 17:18).
  • Both are clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls (Rev. 17:4; 18:16), implying great wealth (Rev. 17:4; 18:19).
  • Both persecute believers (Rev. 17:6; 18:20, 24).
  • They have the same effect on the people.  18:24 reads “for by your sorcery all the nations were deceived” (Rev. 18:24), while 17:2 reads “the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication”.  Is this not saying the same thing in different words?

An unfortunate contributor to the distinction between the harlot and the city is the chapter division between Revelation 17 and 18, which masks the unity of the entire passage.  Chapter divisions are not part of the inspired text and should not influence our interpretations.  Anyone who reads chapters 17 and 18 without preconceived ideas would conclude that the woman and city are the same.

The differentiation made by some dispensationalists is the result of their overly literal interpretation of the text.  The fact that Revelation 17 and 18 represent the same entity in very different words should teach us that this happens also elsewhere in Revelation, and that a literal reading of the text will distort the meaning.  Babylon is therefore both a woman and a city (17:18), just as the New Jerusalem is both a woman and a city (21:9, 10).  Similarly, Jesus is both a lamb and a lion (5:5, 6) and the beast from the earth is also called “the false prophet” (13:12, 13, 19:20).



Some argue that the Babylon of Revelation is the physical city Jerusalem because:

  • The “great city”, which is Babylon (18:10), is described in 11:8 with the words where also their Lord was crucified.  Literally, this is Jerusalem.
  • In Babylon “was found the blood of prophets and of the saints” (18:24).  This is also what Jesus said of Jerusalem (Mat 23:35, Luke 11:50-51).
  • The colour and adornment of the harlot (17:4) reflect the Jewish priestly colours of scarlet, purple, and gold (Ex. 28:33).
  • Babylon has “mother of harlots” on her forehead while Judah had a harlot’s forehead, and was a harlot (Jeremiah 3:3-6).

But Babylon cannot be Jerusalem because it cannot be said that Jerusalem rules over the kings of the earth (17:18), or that Jerusalem has a dominating influence over the world’s population (17:15), or that the merchants grow rich from Jerusalem’s excessive luxuries (18:3).  Since Israel did not even exist as a nation until the time of Jacob, it is obvious that she cannot be the mother or originator of harlots and of the abominations of the earth (17:5), corrupting the earth with her fornication (Rev. 19:2).


Some understand Babylon as all entrenched worldly resistance to God; the total culture of the world apart from God, eagerly embraced by the nations once called Christian; the world with its the cravings of sinful man, the lust of his eyes and the boasting of what he has and does (1 John 2:16); the world’s power, the world’s riches, the world’s trade, the world’s religions and the world’s commerce and culture; the world of lust, all that appeals to the flesh or the mind and entices and seduces us away from God, just as she successfully enticed the kings and inhabitants of the earth away from God.  This view properly accounts for the age old existence and global influence attributed to Babylon, but does not account for the following:

  • Babylon is something specific which the kings are able to kill
  • She is the earthly counterfeit bride, exclusively fundamentally opposed to God’s people
  • The fact that, in Revelation, wealth is a symbol for spiritual condition


A common interpretation of Babylon among literal interpreters is that Babylon is a literal city that will be built on the literal Euphrates River, to become the political and commercial capital of the world.

This interpretation is based on the observation that there are extensive unfulfilled prophecies concerning the destruction of Babylon in the OT as physical, sudden, violent, literal, complete, permanent and catastrophic like that of Sodom and Gomorrah with absolutely nothing left (Isa. 13:1, 19‑22; 14, 47; Jer. 50:35, 39‑40 51:8, 24‑26).  It would become an uninhabitable wasteland.  Her walls will be completely destroyed and her gates burned with fire.  There will be nothing left of her, no person shall ever reside there, “nor will the Arabian pitch tents there, nor will the shepherds make their sheepfolds there” (Isa. 13:19-20).   It “shall be wholly desolate” (Jer. 50:13).  “The wild desert beasts shall dwell there with the jackals” (Jer. 50:39-40).  This destruction will come in the “Day of the Lord” (Isa. 13:6‑11; 13:1; 14:1‑3; Jer. 50:1‑6).  At the time of her destruction there will be a disturbance in the sun and moon (Isa. 13:10).  Then “the whole earth is at rest and is quiet; They break forth into shouts of joy” (Isa 14:7 NASB).

These prophecies have never been fulfilled as they were stated.  On the night that Belshazzar, king of the Chaldeans, was slain and the city came under the control of Cyrus, king of the Medes and Persians, there was no large-scale attack upon the city.  In fact, many within the city were not even aware for quite some time afterwards that the city had been taken.  Cyrus diverted the waters of the Euphrates and by night entered the city through the dried up channel. This allowed armed forces to wade under her defenses without much of a fight.

Babylon fell on October 12, 539 B.C., to Cyrus of Persia, and from that time the city slowly decayed due to competition and neglect.  Xerxes plundered it.  Even when Greece, the great leopard beast of Daniel’s night vision, came in the empire of Alexander the Great, the city was not destroyed.  Alexander marched to Babylon on Oct. 1, 331 B.C., and the Persian garrison offering no opposition.  After Alexander, the city was ruled by the Seleucid kingdom during which Babylon’s economy declined sharply due to competition with the establishment of a new capital at Seleucia on the Tigris (274 B.C.).  Although the city still stood when Roman emperor Trajan entered it in A.D. 115, by about A.D. 200 the site of the city was deserted.  Babylon soon became a desert.

Babylon “fell” numerous times at the hands of different invaders, but it never suffered anything like the predicted complete destruction.  The land around her did not become des­olate, but continued to be populated and fertile.  There was no disturbance in the sun or moon, nor did universal peace follow.

Literal interpreters also point out that the Old Testament predictions of Babylon’s destruction are similar to Revelation’s description of Babylon’s destruction; sudden (“in one day” [18:8, 17]), complete (18:21) and with fire (Rev. 18:18; 16:17‑21).  Literal interpreters therefore argue that the same destruction is in view in both the OT and in Revelation.  Other justifications provided for the view of Babylon as a physical city include:

  • The mention of the Euphrates River in conjunction with Babylon is taken to mean that a physical city is in view.
  • The harlot is represented as “sitting on” a beast.  The beast is a symbol, “sitting” is a symbol and the harlot is a symbol.  These symbols are explained in 17:18.  The harlot is explained as the great city.  “Sits on” is explained as “reigns over”.  The beast is explained as the kings of the world.  Because “city” is the interpretation of the harlot, the city must therefore be understood literally; otherwise we should have the anomaly of a figure representing a figure.
  • Place names have their literal significance in Revelation 1:9; 2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 14 and the writer is very clear to point it out when he intends a figurative meaning as in Revelation 11:8.

A number of objections against Babylon as a literal city may be raised:

ONE: Babylon is not her real name (see above).

TWO: Babylon is an earthly counterfeit bride (see above).

THREE:  The Euphrates is redefined in Revelation as the peoples of the world (17:15).  The Euphrates is Babylon’s river.  Babylon cannot be separated from the Euphrates because Babylon of the OT was built on the Euphrates.  If the Euphrates becomes a symbol, then it follows that Babylon also becomes a symbol.

FOUR: In the angel’s explanation in Revelation 17 he also explains other symbols with symbols.  The seven heads are explained as seven mountains (17:9) and the beast is explained as an eight head or mountain (17:11).  Also elsewhere in Revelation symbols are explained with symbols:

    • The seven lamps are explained as “the seven Spirits of God” (4:5).  “Seven” is not literal, because God does not literally have seven Spirits.  The “seven” means that God’s Spirit is present for the complete period of man’s existence.
    • The “lake of fire” is explained as “the second death” (20:14; 21:8).  If the second death is a symbol of eternal life in hell, then this is also one symbol explaining another.
    • At the end of the vision in Revelation 1 Jesus explained the stars as “the angels of the seven churches” (1:20), but these cannot be real angels.
    • He also explains the seven lampstands as seven churches (1:20).  However, these seven churches also represent all churches of history, as discussed elsewhere.

The following explanations use symbols:

    • The innumerable multitude is explained as the people that washed their clothes in the blood of Jesus (7:14).
    • The two witnesses are explained as “two olive trees and the two lampstands” (11:4) that kill their enemies with fire from their mouth (sic) (11:5).
    • The 144,000 are those that did not defile themselves with women (14:4)

Elsewhere in Revelation more than one symbols are used for the same entity.  Jesus is represented by both a lion and a lamb (5:5, 6), and the beast from the earth is explained as “the false prophet”.

FIVE: Literal Babylon of old is too young to be the Babylon of Revelation.  Babylon exists throughout history, and therefore cannot be a reconstructed city at the end of time.  Literal interpreters defend this point by saying Babylon is actually the false systems of worship which originated in Nimrod’s days.  If this is the logic, then the name Babylon no longer means what it means in the OT.  It then means the persisting influence of that false religion on the kingdoms of the world.  Then this interpretation becomes the same as the interpretation of Babylon as the false religion.  The only difference is the requirement that the city would be rebuilt.  And if Babylon (Babel) existed for all human history in the form of its influence, why does it have to be rebuilt?

SIX: If Babylon is taken as a literal city on the Euphrates River because it has that meaning in the OT, the New Jerusalem must also be the literal Jerusalem in Judea, because these two cities stand in opposition to each other.  But the New Jerusalem includes all God’s people; from both Israel and the Church (21:9, 10, 12, 14).

SEVEN: Babylon has already been destroyed and Old Testament prophecy teaches us it will never be rebuilt.

EIGHT: If end time Babylon is to be a literal city, then the events of the book of Revelation are still a long way off.  Many decades are required for a city to be rebuilt from nothing and to become the global hub for world trade.  This is directly opposed to the principle of “imminence”, i.e. that the rapture may occur at any time, which is often proposed by the same people that propose that Babylon will be a literal city.

Some people think of a city as the physical infrastructure, but a city is more properly a very large and complex congregation of people.  A physical city without people is not really a city, but a large collection of people is a city, even without proper buildings.


In the Academic world Revelation is generally seen not as predictions of the future, but as descriptions of events in John’s time, presented as a prophecy.  The academic view is in general therefore that Babylon is Rome of old and the Beast is Nero.  This view is based on detailed and complex justifications, mostly based on writings outside of the Bible.

This view would make John a liar, because he writes that the things he saw “must soon take place” (1:1).  One of the major justifications is the assumption that the seven hills of Revelation 17:9 identify the topography of the ancient city of Rome.  But these seven hills are defined as seven consecutive kings (17:10).  (The KJV translation is misleading here in its inference that the seven mountains are different from the seven kings.  The Greek says that the “seven heads are seven mountains . . . and they are seven kings.”)  The seven heads are therefore not the Seven Hills of Rome.  Many other identifications of Babylon as discussed above disqualifies Rome.  Another is the fact that Babylon is destroyed after the temple in heaven is closed (16:19, compare 15:8), which happens after every person has made his or her final decision for or against God.  (In the final crisis on earth everybody will have to make a choice.  On the one hand the Image of the Beast will persecute all who do not accept the mark of the beast.  On the other hand God’s message will be proclaimed with such power that the whole earth will be lightened.)

Books can be written to oppose this view, but it would not avail much, as academics generally have an a priori assumption against predictions, due to the scientific method which excludes the possibility of the supernatural.  Should the reader is interested, the article of “When Daniel was written” provides solid proof that Daniel was written long before Antiochus Epiphanies IV, and even before the Greek Empire, which is specifically mentioned in Daniel 8:21.  This is excellent proof of the supernatural ability of God to present predictions in the Bible.


Another view held by some is that the harlot Babylon represents the global system of Roman Catholicism, possibly wed with other religious systems, for the following reasons:

ONE: The blasphemy of the church, claiming for mortal man what belongs only to God:

  1. Jesus says “I have the keys of death and of Hades” (Rev 1:18), but the pope claims to be “the keeper of the keys” [Catholic Ency. II, p 666].
  2. Christ “is the head of the body” (Col 1:18), but the pope claims to be head of all churches [Catholic Ency. II, p 666].  [Dogmatic Decrees of the Council of Trent, p.159,160; Also in Teachings of the Catholic Church, p. 143,144]
  3. “Christ Jesus … will judge the living and the dead” (2 Tim. 4:1), but the Pope claims to be the Judge of the Living and the Dead (Catholic Ency. II, p 666; XV. p 126).
  4. Christ is the “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS” (Rev 19:16), but the pope claims authority above all and to be subject to none. (Pius VI Ency. 65; II, p 666).  “primacy over the whole world”  “the fullest authority … not only the spiritual but also the material sword, and so to transfer sovereignties, break scepters and remove crowns. [Catholic Dictionary, p 258]
  5. Jesus promised “I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; that is the Spirit of truth. (John 14:16-17), but the Pope claim to “hold upon this earth the place of God almighty”. [Pope Leo XIII, Great Encyclical Letters, 304].  “the Roman Pontiff … is true Vicar of Christ”.  The word “vicar” comes from the Latin word “vicarious” which means substitute (Oxford Dictionary).
  6. The Bible teaches that the saved “have washed their robes … in the blood of the Lamb” (7:14), but the Catholic Church claims that for every human creature it is necessary for salvation to be subject to the authority of the Roman Pontiff.” [Cath. Ency. XV, p 126; Dogmatic Decrees of the Council of Trent, p.159,160; Also in Teachings of the Catholic Church, p. 143,144]
  7. Jesus said ” do not be called Rabbi; for One is your Teacher, and you are all brothers” (Mat 23:8), but the church claims that the supreme teacher in the church is the Roman Pontiff [Great Encyclical Letters of Leo XIII, p. 193].

TWO: The Catholic Church changed times and laws (Dan 7:25).  She changed our calendar. In 1518 Pope Gregory changed our calendar ten days.  She changed the laws respecting the Lord’s supper, set up images, enacted celibacy of the clergy.  In 1075 Gregory VII declared all clerical marriages invalid. This was the greatest mass divorce in history.  She changed the 10 commandments.  In general she claims absolute control of all religion.

THREE: The Catholic Church has untold wealth. It is “one of the greatest fiscal powers in the world.” [Nino Lo Bello, The Vatican Empire, p.8]  The Catholic Church makes most of its money through the doctrine of Purgatory.  Many wealthy people over the centuries have bequeathed their estates to the Pope in order to be released from Purgatory sooner, and many over the centuries made large contribution to release their loved ones from Purgatory.

FOUR: A characteristic of Babylon is that she is “drunk with the blood of the saints, the blood of those who bore testimony to Jesus” (17:6).

Rome’s long history was marked with the shedding of the blood of saints.  In 1208 Pope Innocent III warred against the Waldines and Albigines (Bohemian Brethren), in which one million perished. From the beginning of the Jesuits 1540-1580 it is estimated that 900,000 were destroyed through papal cruelty.  One hundred fifty thousand perished by the inquisition in thirty years.  In the low lands 50,000 persons were hanged, beheaded, burned alive or buried alive for the crime of heresy.  Within 38 years from the edict of Charles V, 18,000 were executed.  The Popes tried to put down the reformation in Germany and Switzerland.  One might consider the Massacre of St. Bartholomew, Martyrdom of John Calas, John Wycliff, John Huss, Jerome of Prague, Tyndale, Luther, Persecutions in Germany, France, Scotland, England, Ireland, persecution of Quakers.

The historian W.E. H. Lecky says, “The Church of Rome has shed more innocent blood than any other institution that ever existed among mankind, will be questioned by no Protestant who has a complete knowledge of history.” Some historians have estimated that the persecuting hands of Rome have been reddened by the blood of fifty million saints. I doubt that anyone can come close to the exact number.

The Catholic Church is drunk on the blood of Saints.  Is there any other institution on the face of the earth that more likely fits the above description?

FIVE: Babylon “reigns over the kings of the earth” (17:18).  During the long dark period of history known as the Middle Ages the Catholic Church dealt with a high hand.  She made and unmade kings:

Emperors and kings had to … be in communion with the Pope, as essential conditions of their reigning lawfully; if these conditions were broken, of which the Pope was the judge, then … he could … declare their ruler unfit to reign. [Cath Dic, 257]

Sixtus V (Cath. Ency. I729) excommunicated Protestant Henry of Navarre, and sent an army to unseat him.  Sixtus promised the Spanish King a subsidy for the Armada, with which England was to be subjugated.  Let’s take a look at how Pope Gregory compels King Henry to freeze three days before he would receive him:

Striped of his royal robes, and clad as a penitent, Henry had to come barefooted mid ice and snow, and crave for admission to the presence of the pope. All day he remained at the door of the citadel, fasting and exposed to the inclemency of the wintry weather, but was refused admission. A second and third day he thus humiliated and disciplined himself, and finally on 28 January, l077, he was received by the pontiff and absolved from censure, but on condition that he would appear at the proposed council and submit himself to its decision. Cath. Ency. VI, 794

All of this shows how arrogant the Catholic Church was during the dark ages and how she ruled over the kingdoms of Europe.

SIX: A further reason for identifying the Catholic Church as Babylon is the similarity between this Church and the ancient religion that originated in the time of Nimrod.  This ancient religion takes on different forms in different cultures, but they all contained one central feature, the worship of the goddess mother and her child.  Often the names changed, but no matter where you went, pictures and images of a mother (Semiramis) with a child (Tammuz) in her arms were found.

SEVEN: The Catholic Church acknowledges that its doctrines are not based on the Bible, but on “traditions”.  First Timothy 4:1‑5 gives us one of the primary doctrines of latter day Babylonianism, namely celibacy among the priests.  This has led to horrible atro­cities in the Roman Catholic Church.  In Chiniquy’s book, Fifty Years in the Roman Catholic Church, he says that a young student priest was question­ing a superior about this doctrine of Rome and received the following reply: “You have spoken as a true heretic…you speak of the Holy Scriptures just as a Protestant would, do you appeal to them as the only source of Christian truth and knowledge. Have you forgotten that we have the holy traditions to guide us, the authority of which is equal to the Scriptures?” This nullified Scripture on the basis of human tradition (Mark 7:13).  Such a position refuses to allow people to carry out their responsibility to func­tion as Berean believers, “examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11).

EIGHT: The purple and scarlet—in which the “woman was clothed” (17:4)—is the ecclesiastical dress of the Roman Church, which on occasions also involves glittering jewels and of course the gold cup.

Many Protestants think of the Catholic religion as unattractive and that its worship is a dull, meaningless round of ceremony.  Here they mistake.  Romanism is not coarse and clumsy.  The religious service of the Roman Church is a most impressive ceremonial.  Its gorgeous display and solemn rites fascinate the senses of the people and silence the voice of reason and of conscience. The eye is charmed.  Magnificent churches, imposing processions, golden altars, jeweled shrines, choice paintings, and exquisite sculpture appeal to the love of beauty.  The ear also is captivated.  The music is unsurpassed.  The rich notes of the deep-toned organ, blending with the melody of many voices as it swells through the lofty domes and pillared aisles of her grand cathedrals, cannot fail to impress the mind with awe and reverence.

This outward splendor, pomp, and ceremony, that only mock the longings of the sin-sick soul, are evidence of inward corruption. The religion of Christ needs not such attractions to recommend it. In the light shining from the cross, true Christianity appears so pure and lovely that no external decorations can enhance its true worth. It is the beauty of holiness, a meek and quiet spirit, which is of value with God.

NINE: It is clear from Daniel 7 that some power emanating from the Roman Empire will become the end time anti-God power and will continue until the return of Christ.  Historicists informs us that the Roman Catholic Church descended from Rome and inherited

The problem with taking Babylon to be either Rome or Roman Catholicism is her relatively late appearance as a major empire.  She did not exist throughout human history.  Neither is she global.  Have the kings of Asia and Africa committed fornication with the Papacy?  It is true that the Italian pontiffs have ruled over a wide territory, yet it is also true that there are many lands which have remained untouched by their religious influence.  It is evident from these two points alone that we have to go back to something which long antedates the rise of the Papacy, and to something which has exerted a far wider influence than has any of the popes.  The Catholic Church may be the prime example of the organization representing Babylon in our time, but Babylon itself is much bigger and older, and also includes other religions.

Babylon is the mother of all harlots and abominations of the earth. From her have come ancient paganism, Chinese Confucianism, Asian Buddhism, Indian Hinduism, Shamanism, Taoism, Shintoism, animism, astrology, witchcraft, spiritism, Sikhism, New Age Movement and all the world’s vast complex of “gods many, and lords many” (1 Corinthians 8:5).  Texe Marrs in his book Dark Secrets of the New Age lists nearly 30 rituals and beliefs found in ancient Babylon that are practiced today in the New Age Movement!  Everything from reincarnation to occult meditation was commonplace 3,000 years ago.  The New Age thus is a revival of the Old Age.  Roman Catholicism is not “the mother of the harlots and of the abominations of the earth,” i.e., the mother, or fountain head of all the systems of idolatry which have since flooded “the earth” from that one great source.  Romanism is only a daughter.

Of concern in this age is the direct descent of modern scientism and evolutionary humanism from this ancient mother of harlots.  Modern evolutionism is in no way scientific, being contradicted by all true facts of science, but is merely a revival of ancient Greek (and ultimately Babylonian) evolutionary pantheism.

TO: General Table of Contents

The Sixth Plague

This article serves as a summary of the various articles dealing with aspects of the sixth plagues.

The sixth plague is described in five verses. The first verse reads as follows:

16:12 The sixth angel poured out his bowl
on the great river, the Euphrates;
and its water was dried up,
so that the way would be prepared for the kings from the east.

Literal interpretations sometimes assume that this refers to the literal Euphrates that will literally dry up to allow literal kings from the east to attack the literal city of Babylon. Given the modern ability to send unmanned aircraft and missiles to the remotest parts of the world, this would indeed be a strange interpretation. Rivers have deterred armies in the time when Revelation was written, but certainly not today.


The article – The great river, the Euphrates – discusses:

What is the great river, the Euphrates?
What is the drying up of the Euphrates?

In summary, it concludes as follows:


Since the first five plagues are worldwide and since there are no indications in the plagues of portions, as one finds in the seals and the trumpets, the Euphrates River is also worldwide.  This, of course, also means that the drying up of the waters of the Euphrates is a global event.

Revelation uses the Euphrates as a symbol for the peoples of the world.  This conclusion is based on two components:

Revelation uses the names Euphrates and Babylon several times, but nowhere does it define a relationship between them.  However, Revelation does say that Babylon sits on many waters. Since we know from history that the Euphrates River flowed through the ancient city of Babylon, by inference, the many waters is another name for the Euphrates.
(Many waters = Euphrates)

Revelation explicitly defines the many waters as the peoples of the world.
(Many waters = Peoples)

Therefore: Many Waters = Euphrates = Peoples of the world


Hundreds of years before Christ, the water of the literal Euphrates was literally dried up to prepare the way for literal kings from the east; Cyrus and the kings of the Medes and the Persians.  They came from the east.  Since Revelation uses a historical event to describe this a future event, the drying up of the Euphrates is symbolic language.  

As mentioned above, Babylon “sits” on the Euphrates.  That is explained by 17:2 as: “Those who dwell on the earth were made drunk with the wine of her immorality.”  Babylon is the false system of religion that has existed for all of human history.  That she sits on the peoples of the world symbolizes her intoxicating influence on the world.  She controls them. 

However, Babylon has also fully infected Christianity.  As shown in a previous article, the throne of the beast is particularly Christian religious authority.  The enemy of God in Revelation is not other religions in general, but the Christian version of Babylon in particular.  

Dried up” then means that false Christianity will lose its hold on the people of the world.  These concepts are explained in more detail in the abovementioned article – The great river, the Euphrates.


The article – Kings from the East – shows that these kings are a symbol of Christ and His angels.  In summary, that article offers the following proofs:

There are TWO GROUPS OF KINGS in the sixth plague.  Since the kings of the whole world make war against God, the kings from the east fight with God.

In Scripture, God comes from the EAST.

The sixth plague uses language from the DELIVERANCE OF GOD’S PEOPLE from ancient literal Babylon.  This implies that this plague describes God’s deliverance of His end-time people, which He will do through Christ.

The sixth plague does not describe either of the two groups of kings, but both are DESCRIBED IN CHRIST’S RETURN.  In the Return of Christ, we see the kings of the world gathered and God’s kings moving towards them.  Satan is represented, in both the sixth plague and the Return of Christ, by 4 categories: The dragon, the beast, the false prophet and by the kings of the world.


The drying up only prepares the way for the kings from the east.  The high-level analysis of chapters 16 to 19 in the article – Kings from the East – shows that chapters 17 and 18 are an interruption and that the seventh plague continues in Revelation 19 with the Return of Christ.  In other words, the seventh plague ends with the Return of Christ.  The sixth plague is, consequently, the preparation, but the seventh plague is “the war of the great day of God” (16:14) – Armageddon.


According to the final verse of the Sixth Plague, the demon-spirits gather the kings of the world to the place which in Hebrew is called Har-Magedon(Rev. 16:16).  This place Har-Magedon is identified in the article Armageddon, which is how this place is usually called.  In summary, that article concludes as follows:

There is no place called Armageddon (Har-Magedon in the NASB).

Interpreters offer many solutions to identify a specific geographical location, but none of these proposals are especially persuasive.  For this reason, we should interpret Armageddon figuratively.  Other reasons to prefer a symbolic interpretation include the following:

      • The SYMBOLIC context of the plagues;
      • MODERN WARFARE does not allow for a world war limited to one specific geographical location. 
      • The GLOBAL nature of the other plagues.


The book of Revelation describes Armageddon in many other places without using the word Armageddon:

There are many similarities between Armageddon in the Sixth Plague and the Return of Christ in Revelation 19.  For example, in both there are two groups of kings, with the kings of the world are gathered together for war to one place while the other kings move towards them. 

Both the harvest at the end of Revelation 14 and the war at the Return of Christ in Revelation 19 refer to the treading of the winepress.

The sixth seal is the “GREAT DAY of their wrath,” similar to the “GREAT DAY of God” in the Sixth Plague.

The sixth plague is the only place in the Bible where we find the exact phrase “the great day of God,” but outside Revelation variations of it appear in nearly 30 verses.  Armageddon is, therefore, the same as the “Day of the Lord,” which is found all over the Bible.

Since Armageddon is mentioned repeatedly in Revelation and since it is the same as the Old Testament war of the “Day of the Lord,” it cannot be a world war between the nations of the world that is limited to one geographical location on the globe.


The kings of the earth are not gathered to a physical place, but the spirits of demons will unite world leaders in mind and spirit against God.  Armageddon will be a physical war, but it will be worldwide, and it will be a war between God and man.


According to Revelation 16:12—the first verse of the sixth plague—the waters of the Euphrates River have to dry up to prepare the way for the Kings from the east.  As discussed above:

The Euphrates River symbolizes the people that support false Christianity.  Drying up means that the people’s support for false Christianity dries up.  This will happen after false Christianity suffers a lethal blow to its authority during the first five plagues (See Fifth plague). 

The Kings from the East have been interpreted as Christ and His angels at His return.

According to verses 13 to 16, after false Christianity loses its popular support, it receives renewed strength in the form of “spirits of demons, performing signs” (16:14).  These demon spirits enable the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet to gather the kings of the world at Armageddon (16:16).

This is discussed in the article, Why the Euphrates dries up to prepare the way for the Kings from the east.  A summary of that article is as follows:

The demon spirits mean that God allows Satan direct control.  


The people with the Mark of the beast are similar to the Pharisees of Christ’s day.  They are Bible-believing, church-going Christians, but for them, the traditional teaching of the church is more important than the truth.  In reality, Satan is their god.  In their view, God is cruel and quick to judge, for they ascribe Satan’s character to God.  Then they interpret the Bible accordingly.

However, through the first five plagues, they come to realize that they are serving Satan; not God.  But they do not change, for they have become so hardened that they are unable to repent

When Satan sends his demons to gather the kings, the people with these modern Pharisees accept this new power with the full knowledge that this power is from Satan. 


Why must the waters dry up to prepare the way for the kings from the east?  Literally speaking, why must false Christianity realize that it is false before may Christ return?


The rebellion against God on earth actually began in heaven when a huge number of God’s HOLY angels joined Satan.

God condemned Satan and his angels to hell.  To defend himself, Satan accused God of unfair judgment.  God also sentenced the people with the Mark of the Beast to death.  Satan, therefore, similarly accuses God of bad judgment with respect to the people with the Mark of the beast.

Due to Satan’s enormous intellect and skill, many of even the sinless heavenly beings do not know whether Satan is telling the truth!


God wants all intelligent beings to trust Him fully.  In particular, He wants all intelligent beings to understand His judgments.  For that reason that He pours out the plagues, even after the eternal destiny of every person on earth has been permanently fixed.  Through the plagues, He will shows, to all of God’s intelligent creatures, throughout the universe, that His judgment is correct

In particular, the plagues reveal to the on-looking universe the true nature of these modern Pharisees.  To do that, the plagues will reveal to the modern Pharisees that they are deceived and that they are, in reality, followers of Satan, persecuting God by persecuting His people.  This is done so that all the universe can see how the modern Pharisees respond.  Through the refusal to repent it becomes clear that they really are committed to Satan’s principles, which confirms God’s judgment of them, namely that they must die the second death.  


The last four verses of the sixth plague read as follows:

16:13 And I saw coming
out of the mouth of the dragon and
out of the mouth of the beast and
out of the mouth of the false prophet,
three unclean spirits like frogs;
14 for they are spirits of demons, performing signs,
which go out to the kings of the whole world,
to gather them together
for the war of the great day of God, the Almighty.

16 And they gathered them together to the place
which in Hebrew is called Har-Magedon.

The dragon is Satan (12:9).  The beast came from the sea (13:1) and is identified in the article on the Seven-Headed Beasts of Revelation.  The false prophet is the beast from the earth (compare 13:12 to 19:20). 

The war of the great day of God” is “Har-Magedon,” also known as Armageddon.  That article identifies Armageddon, NOT as a physical place, but an event, namely the Day of the Lord.  The spirits of demons will unite the world leaders; not in a place, but against God in mind and is spirit.


In Revelation, many things come out of mouths, such as “fire, smoke and brimstone” (9:15-17; 11:5), “water like a river” (12:15) and “a sharp sword” (19:15).  These are not literal things coming out of literal mouths.  What comes out of the mouth symbolizes what the being does.  For example, the Image of the beast will “speak and cause as many as do not worship the image of the beast to be killed” (13:15; cf. 13:5; 11-13).  The mouth, therefore, is not important. What is important is WHAT comes out of the mouth, for that symbolizes the will and deeds of the being. 


Some believe the demons are “like frogs” (16:13) because frogs catch their prey with their tongues.  Others see some symbolic meaning in the fact that the frogs were the last plague on Egypt which the Egyptian wizards were able to replicate.  The view here is that simply the frogs must be understood like the “unclean and hateful birds,” which are also mentioned in 18:2 with unclean spirits.  “Like frogs” then simply highlights the repulsive nature of the unclean spirits in God’s sight.


SPIRITS OF DEMONS come out of the mouths of the evil trio.  This indicates an escalation of Satanic power which allows the evil trio to perform extraordinary deeds (signs). 

Previously the false prophet deceived mankind to make an Image of the beast by “great signs, so that he even makes fire come down out of heaven to the earth in the presence of men”  (Rev 13:13-14).  Now the dragon, beast, and false prophet perform signs to gather the kings of the whole world together for the war of the great day of God, the Almighty – Armageddon (16:14, 16).  Through these miracles, Satan will succeed to unite the world behind him and against God.

One often hears Christians claiming miracles.  That does not prove that these things are by God’s power.  The “lawless one … whom the Lord will … bring to an end by the appearance of His coming,” will come “with all power and signs and false wonders(2Th 2:8-9).  Jesus also said, false prophets will … show great signs and wonders” (Mt. 24:24 cf. Mark 13:22).

False Christianity receives this renewed strength IN RESPONSE TO THE SETBACKS of the first five plagues, which resulted in the waters (human support) drying up, but that strength comes from Satan.  They receive the persuasive ability to lead men to an unconditional commitment to the cause of evil.  


Does the phrase, “coming like a thief” in Revelation 16:15, support a secret rapture?

This article discusses the rapture-like language in Revelation 16:15.  It is not intended to discuss the rapture in general, but only whether this verse, in particular, supports the rapture concept.

In the middle of the sixth plague, immediately after God’s enemies have received renewed power from demon spirits to enable them to gather together the kings of the world for the battle of Armageddon, Jesus warns:

“Behold, I am coming like a thief.
Blessed is the one who stays awake and keeps his clothes,
so that he will not walk about naked
and men will not see his shame.” (Rev. 16:15)


Dispensationalism proposes that, seven years before Christ’s visible return, there will be an invisible and inaudible secret rapture that will remove the church from the earth. 

The phrase, “coming like a thief,” in the sixth plague, is sometimes interpreted to refer to this secret rapture.  There are, however, a number of passages in the Bible that mention Jesus coming like a THIEF, and it nowhere means that the relevant event will be inaudible or invisible. It always means that nobody can predict WHEN Jesus will return. 

Jesus comes like a thief on THE DAY OF THE LORD, which, in the sixth plague, refers to as THE WAR OF THE GREAT DAY OF GOD, the Almighty.  On that day there will be sudden destruction.  The heavens will pass away with a roar and the earth and its works will be burned up.  It does not like a secret event. 

The same warning which Jesus gave in 16:15, namely that His people must keep their clothes, He gave to the seven churches.  This implies that the church is still on earth during the plagues. 

But there is a difference.  The sixth plague urges God’s people TO KEEP their clothes while the Laodiceans are advised TO BUY white garments.  Jesus’s warning is, therefore, only intended for God’s people; not for the world in general.  This firstly confirms, as discussed in the Introduction to the Plagues of Revelation, that when the plagues fall, the time for repentance has passed.  


Does “coming like a thief” in Revelation 16:15, support a secret rapture?

This article discusses the rapture-like language in Revelation 16:15.  It is not intended to discuss the rapture in general, but only whether this verse supports the rapture concept.

In the middle of the sixth plague, immediately after God’s enemies have received renewed power from demon spirits to enable them to gather together the kings of the world for the battle of Armageddon, Jesus warns:

“Behold, I am coming like a thief.
Blessed is the one who stays awake and keeps his clothes,
so that he will not walk about naked
and men will not see his shame.” (Rev. 16:15)

Dispensationalism proposes that, seven years before Christ’s visible return, there will be an invisible and inaudible secret rapture that will remove the church from the earth. 

The phrase, “coming like a thief,” in the sixth plague, is sometimes interpreted to refer to this secret rapture.  There are, however, a number of passages in the Bible that mention Jesus coming like a THIEF, and it nowhere means that the event will be inaudible or invisible. It always means that nobody can predict WHEN Jesus will return. 

Jesus comes like a thief on THE DAY OF THE LORD, which the sixth plague refers to as THE WAR OF THE GREAT DAY OF GOD, the Almighty.  Then there will be sudden destruction.  The heavens will pass away with a roar and the earth and its works will be burned up.  It will not be a secret event. 

The same warning which Jesus gives in 16:15, that God’s people must keep their clothes, He gave to the seven churches.  This implies that the church is still on earth during the plagues. 

But there is a difference.  In the sixth plague, God’s people are urged TO KEEP their clothes while the Laodiceans are advised TO BUY white garments.  Jesus’s warning is only to God’s people; not to the world in general.  This confirms that, when the plagues fall, the time for repentance has passed.  This is consistent with the proposal that the church is still on earth.




Next: Seventh Plague

TO: General Table of Contents

The mighty angel of Revelation 18 destroys the beast’s Christian authority.

16:10-11 The fifth angel poured out his bowl
on the throne of the beast,
and his kingdom became darkened;
and they gnawed their tongues because of pain,
and they blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains …;
and they did not repent of their deeds. (NASB)


These verses use the pronoun “they” for “his kingdom,” rather than “it.”  The kingdom, therefore, refers to the people of the beast’s kingdom; not to its territory.  This is consistent with what we saw in the first plague (16:2), namely that the plagues SELECTIVELY target the people of the kingdom of the Beast.  They are the people with the mark of the beast.


The dragon gave him (the beast) his power and his throne
and great authority
” (Rev. 13:2).

The beast, in other words, received its throne from the dragon.  “Power,” “throne,” and “authority” are understood to be synonyms.  The beast’s throne is, therefore, his authority, namely that which gives him the power to rule.

To understand what its throne is, we need to know who the dragon is, for it receives its throne from the dragon (13:2). 


Great Red DragonBoth the beast and the dragon have seven heads and ten horns. This indicates some close relationship: They are of the same species.

The article that discusses the Seven-Headed Beasts of Revelation, concludes that when the dragon stands before the woman, ready to devour her Child (that is, Jesus – see Revelation 12:3-4), it represents the FOURTH KINGDOM of Daniel 7.  (The word ‘when’ is important, for when the dragon wages war against Michael and his angels, it represents something else, namely Satan (12:7).)

The study of Daniel 7 identifies that fourth kingdom as the ROMAN EMPIRE, which ruled the known world when Jesus was born.  the dragon in Revelation 12:3-4 is, therefore, the Roman Empire.


This identification of the dragon can be confirmed from Revelation 13, where also the Beast appears for the first time:

1 And the DRAGON stood on the sand of the seashore.
Then I saw a BEAST coming up out of the sea,
having ten horns and seven heads …
2 … the beast … was like a leopard,
and his feet were like those of a bear,
and his mouth like the mouth of a lion.
And the dragon gave him his power and his throne …

The sea, out of which the beast comes, is a symbol for the peoples of the world (Daniel 7:3, 17).  Since this beast arises out of the sea, this article often refers to it as the Sea Beast.

Daniel 7 symbolizes a series of kingdoms by means of four ferocious beasts.  The four beasts listed in Revelation 13:2 are exactly the same as the beasts described in Daniel 7.  But we do not see these beasts in action in Revelation 13. We merely see that the Sea Beast looks like them. That is understood to mean that the Sea Beast is later than these four beasts and that it inherits characteristics from each of them.  It inherits:

Its appearance from the leopard.
Its feet from the bear.
Its mouth from the lion.
Its throne from the dragon.

These four animals are identified in the article on Daniel 7 as:

      1. Ancient Babylon (lion);
      2. Mede-Persia (bear);
      3. Greece (leopard) and
      4. Rome (non-descript beast in Daniel 7—Dragon in Revelation). 

This confirms that the dragon is the Roman Empire and that the beast, therefore, receives its throne (authority) from that empire.  


The question then is, what type of authority did the beast receive from the dragon?  The article that discusses this question concluded that the throne of the beast is religious authority.  In summary, that article provides evidence that the throne of the beast is Christian religious authority. This is based on the following considerations:

    • The flow of thought in the plagues;
    • The general nature of conflict in Revelation as a war of worship;
    • The description of the persecuting powers as a woman, a lamb, and as a false prophet performing wonders and signs, intent on changing God’s law, and the fact that it always is false religion that persecutes true religion.

To explain this in historical context:

In the fourth century, the Roman Empire made Christianity its sole religion.  The Emperor became the de facto head of the church and had both military and religious authority.  When the military might of the Western Empire was conquered by the barbarian tribes, particularly in the fifth century, the Emperor’s religious authority continued to exert its influence in the West through the church. 


A further article compares the call made on God’s people by the mighty angel in Revelation 18 with the fifth plague.  It concludes that the mighty angel’s message of Revelation 18 causes the darkness of the fifth plague.  In summary:

In Revelation 18 a mighty angel cries out “Fallen, fallen is Babylon … Come out of her, my people.”  This is a message proclaimed on earth by God’s people through the power of the Holy Spirit. 

By analyzing the time sequence of the end-time events, this article shows that the fifth plague is the mighty angel’s powerful message.  That message convinces the peoples of the world that light from their system of worship is actually spiritual darkness.


The beast’s throne is a symbol of its power and authority, which it receives from the dragon, which is the Roman Empire.  But that was Christian religious authority; not financial or military power. 

The beast’s kingdom is his subjects, namely the people with the mark of the beast.  The plagues target them selectively.

The first four plagues seriously eroded the beast’s authority, for these plagues ONLY affected its followers; the people with the mark of the beast.

The fifth plague is also the loud cry, namely the mighty angel of Revelation 18 that cries out “Fallen, fallen is Babylon … Come out of her, my people.”  This is followed by “another voice from heaven, saying,’Come out of her, my people‘” (v4).

This is a message proclaimed on earth by God’s people through the power of the Holy Spirit.  This message convinces the peoples of the world that light from their system of worship is actually spiritual darkness.  This completely destroys the beast’s reputation and therefore its authority (throne). Consequently, in the sixth plague, the people of the world withdraw their support from the beast.  (See Sixth Plague)

These conclusions are based on a number of articles, including:

The Seven-Headed Beasts of Revelation
The beasts of Daniel 7
The animals of Daniel 7 and 8 identify the Evil Horn.
The throne of the beast is religious authority.
The mighty angel of Revelation 18 is the fifth plague.

Next: Sixth Plague 
TO: General Table of Contents