The Seven Last Years of Daniel 9:27 ended a few years after the Cross.

Excerpt: The seven last years is the crux of the 490 years.  The previous 483 years only serve to locate the seven last years in time.  During those seven last years, the goals set for the entire period are fulfilled.  Jesus confirmed God’s covenant with Israel for seven years through His personal preaching before His death and by sending His disciples to Israel only for a few years after His death.

Who is the “he” that confirms the covenant with the many for the Seven Last Years? (Daniel 9:27)

The “he” is 9:27 is the Messiah, for the following reasons:

(1) As discussed, the prophecy has a Poetic Pattern, and in this pattern “he” is the Messiah.

(2) The prophecy is also structured as a chiasm, and this chiasm also indicates that the “he” is the Messiah.  See Poetic Parallelism and Chiasm in Daniel 9.

(3) The dominant figure in verse 26 (and in the entire prophecy) is the “Messiah“.  The “prince that shall come” is not the subject of that clause in verse 26.  It reads “people of the prince”, not “the prince of the people”.   The “prince” in verse 26 is a subordinate figure.  The Messiah should, therefore, be preferred as the antecedent for the “he” in verse 27.

(4) In the discussion of Daniel 9:26, it was shown that the prince in 9:26 is a supernatural being, representing the Roman nation.  The “he” in 9:27, who is a human being, therefore cannot refer back to the prince in verse 26.  The proper antecedent for “he” is the Messiah.

The previous article (Daniel 9:27 The Covenant) has already shown that the covenant in Daniel 9:27 is God’s covenant with Israel.  If it is the Messiah who confirms it, then we have added support for the conclusion that it is God’s covenant; not the devil’s, as in Dispensationalism.

The years before and after His death

Proposal

The previous verse (9:26) described the destruction of Jerusalem, which was in AD 70.  If the events in the prophecy were presented in chronological sequence, then the “one week” (9:27) must follow after AD 70.  It is, however, proposed here that the “one week” (9:27) are the seven years around Christ’s death.  Jesus Christ confirmed God’s covenant with Israel during those seven years:

First through His personal preaching before His death;

Then, for a further three or four years after His death, by sending His disciples with the power of the Holy Spirit, but only to Israel and only to Jerusalem.  In those years the church consisted only of Jews and it still adhered to all Old Testament laws.  The infant church was still a Jewish sect.  See Early Church.

490 years

Rationale

This proposal is based on the following:

(1) The events are not given in chronological sequence, as discussed above under the Poetic Pattern.

(2) The only event during the first 483 years is “restore and rebuild Jerusalem”.  The death of the Messiah, the “confirm the covenant” and the “cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease” (9:27) all happen during the seven last years.  These seven last years, therefore, are the core and the real purpose of the 490 years.  The first 483 years merely serve to locate the seven last years in time.  The seven last years must, therefore, follow immediately after the first 483 years.

(3) The “he” that confirms the covenant of “one week” is the Messiah, as already discussed.

(4) The last part of 9:27 describes the destruction of Jerusalem.  The covenant in verse 27 is therefore confirmed prior to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The last part of 9:27 is analyzed in the next article.

(5) The Seventy Weeks (490 years) are promised by God as years of Jewish preference (“for your people and your holy city”).  As concluded in the discussion of The Covenant in Daniel 9, these 490 years were an extension of God’s covenant with Israel.

First few years after the Cross

To understand the hypothesis of this article it is important to note that God’s covenant with Israel did not come to an end when Israel crucified its Messiah.  During the first few years after the Cross God gave Israel a final opportunity to repent by sending the power of the Holy Spirit, but to Israel alone (Acts 10:47-11:3, 18, 19).  The gospel was preached only to Jews.  The church consisted only of the “circumcised” (cf. 10:45; i.e. Jews) and they did not associate with the uncircumcised (Acts 10:34-35).  See Jerusalem Phase of the Early Church.

About three or four years after the Cross the Jews persecuted these Jewish Christians, commencing with the stoning of Stephen (Acts 7; 8:1).  They thereby, for the last time, broke the covenant with God.  See Judea and Samaria Phase of the Early Church.

Peter and his fellow Jews were reluctant to let go of the exclusive privilege, but soon after the persecution of the Christians, Peter had the dream of the unclean beasts (Acts 10:11, 12, 19-20).  Through this vision, God told him, and the church, not to “call any man common or unclean” (Acts 10:28).  In other words, God led them to accept Gentiles as equals and to preach the gospel also to Gentiles (v34-35).  That was the end of God’s covenant with Israel, and the end of the Seventy Weeks.  That was when “he” (the Messiah) would no longer “confirm the covenant with the many” (9:27).  Israel lost its special place in God’s plan.  The kingdom of God was taken away from the Jews (Matt. 21:43).

Stephen’s Speech

Stoning of Stephen
Stoning of Stephen

This conclusion is supported by Stephen’s speech.  Both Daniel’s prayer and Stephen’s speech are based on God’s covenant with Israel.  While Daniel confessed the sins of his people and prayed for the mercy promised in the covenant, Stephen’s speech was an announcement of God’s judgment in terms of the covenant.  In other words, Stephen announced the end of the Seventy WeeksPlease see the article, Stoning of Stephen, for more detail.

&0 weeks of Daniel 9

The last “one week” of years, therefore, follows immediately after the 69th; and therefore immediately after His baptism.  There is no gap, as proposed by Dispensationalism.

 

 

Articles in this series

(1) The traditional interpretation of Daniel 9 is Historical-Messianic, in which the 490 years is an extension of God’s covenant with Israel.

(2) The 490 years began with Artaxerxes’ decree.  The first 483 years ended with the arrival of the Messiah, namely His baptism in the 15th year of Emperor Tiberius. – CURRENT ARTICLE

(3) The Messiah who is cut off is our Lord Jesus Christ.  The people who destroy the city are the Romans. The prince in Daniel 9:26 is a supernatural force controlling that Empire.

(4) The prophecy’s Poetic Pattern alternates between Jerusalem and the Messiah. In this pattern, Jesus confirms the covenant in Daniel 9:27.

(5) Jesus confirmed God’s covenant for the Seven Last Years by His personal preaching and by sending His disciples to Israel ONLY for a few years after His death. – CURRENT ARTICLE

(6) Daniel 9 promises atonement for sin (9:24) through the killing of the messiah (v26), while he will put a stop to sacrifice (9:27).  In light of the New Testament, this messiah is Jesus Christ.

(7) The Poetic Pattern and the repetition of ideas from verse 26 identify the “complete destruction” in Daniel 9:27c as the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.

(8) The key message of Daniel 9 is that the Messiah will appear within 500 years after Jerusalem is given back to the Jews; before Jerusalem is destroyed in AD 70.

See also, the Summary of all Daniel 9 articles, including the Dispensational Interpretation of Daniel 9.  Another series identifies the Antichrist in the other prophecies of Daniel.

It is Jesus who “will make a firm covenant with the many” in Daniel 9:27.

triumphal entry into Jerusalem
Jesus enters Jerusalem

The prophecy has a Poetic Pattern in which the focus alternates between two foci; Jerusalem and the Messiah. The prophecy is therefore not given in a strict chronological sequence. In this pattern, it is Jesus who confirms the covenant for seven years in Daniel 9:27.

Poetic Pattern

Ark of the Covenant
Ark of the Covenant

One fundamental issue in the interpretation of Daniel 9 is that God’s covenant with Israel is the main theme of the entire chapter, binding Daniel’s prayer and the prophecy together.  This was discussed above (Historical Messianic Interpretation).  Another fundamental issue is the Poetic Pattern of the prophecy.  This is discussed in more detail in Poetic pattern and Chiasm, but is summarized below:

Parallelism

The Daniel 9 prophecy uses much parallelism, where two related words or phrases are used together to emphasize a point, for instance:

Insight with understanding (v22);
Give heed to the message and gain an understanding of the vision (v23);
Your people and your holy city (v24);
To finish the transgression, to make an end of sin (v24);
Know and discern (v25);
Restore and rebuild (v25);
Seven weeks and sixty-two weeks (v26);
The city and the sanctuary (v26); and
Sacrifice and grain offering.

Two foci

But perhaps the most important pattern in the prophecy is the way in which the focus jumps repeatedly back and forth between the two foci; Jerusalem and the Messiah:

25: from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem;
until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;
it will be built again, with plaza and moat, even in times of distress.
26: after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.
27: he shall confirm the covenant …; and … cause the sacrifice … to cease … he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation …

Verses 25 and 26 explicitly shift the focus four times between Jerusalem and the Messiah.  The prophecy is, therefore, a form of poetic parallelism in which Jerusalem and the Messiah are the two foci.  These two foci stand in cause-effect relationships; the city is rebuilt to receive the Messiah, but it is again destroyed because it did not receive the Messiah.

Not sequential

The first implication of the Poetic Pattern is that the events in Daniel 9 are not given in strict chronological sequence.  The following examples confirm this conclusion:

The rebuilding of the city (25c) is mentioned after the appearance of the Messiah (25b), while the city was rebuilt four hundred years before the Messiah.

The prince causes sacrifices to cease in Daniel 9:27 after the sanctuary is destroyed (9:26).  But if the sanctuary is destroyed, there does not remain a sacrificial system that can be ceased.

Since 70 weeks have been determined for the city of “your people” (9:24), the destruction of the city and the sanctuary in verse 26 must occur after the end of the 70 weeks, and therefore after the 70th week of Daniel 9:27.

Implications for Daniel 9:27

The further implication is that Daniel 9:27 continues this pattern:

The Cross
Messiah cut off

Since verse 26 ends with a reference to Jerusalem, the first part of Daniel 9;27, describing the “he” who confirms the covenant for seven years, but “cause the sacrifice … to cease” in the middle of that week, should be the Messiah who is cut off in verse 26.

Similarly, the destruction in the last part of Daniel 9:27 should refer to Jerusalem.

See Poetic Pattern and Chiasm in Daniel 9 for a further discussion.

It is God’s Covenant with Israel.

The covenant in Daniel 9:27 is God’s covenant with Israel, for the following reasons:

(1) God’s covenant with Israel is the central theme throughout the entire Daniel 9, as discussed above and as explained in The Covenant in Daniel 9.

(2) Also as discussed above, the full 490 years are God’s renewed covenant with Israel.  The “one week” in Daniel 9:27 is the last seven years of that covenant.

(3) The phrase “confirm the covenant” (9:27 KJV) means that this covenant existed prior to the 70th week.  Then it can only be God’s covenant with Israel.

The verb translated “make a firm” in the NASB is “gâbar”.  Strong’s short definition of this word is “prevailed”.  Of the 25 times this word appears in the OT, it is 14 times translated as ‘prevail’. The evidence of the usage of gâbar in the Bible (“The covenant of the Seventieth Week” by Meredith G. Kline) indicates that Daniel 9:27 has in view the enforcing of a covenant previously granted.  It is not a verb for the initial making of a covenant.  It should, therefore, be translated as “make firm a covenant”, and not as “make a firm covenant”.  The KJV translates it as “confirm the covenant” and Young’s Literal Translation reads “strengthening a covenant”.  “Confirm” and “strengthen” imply a covenant that existed prior to the last seven years.  If so, it can only refer to God’s faithful fulfillment of the covenant He has given to Israel.

(4)The many”, with whom the covenant is confirmed, most often refers to God’s people.  For instance:

The Righteous One, My Servant, will justify the many, As He will bear their iniquities“ (Isa 53:11)

Those who have insight among the people will give understanding to the many; yet they will fall by sword and by flame, by captivity and by plunder for many days” (Dan 11:33; See also Dan 11:39; 12:3; Matt. 26:28; Hebr. 9:26-28; Rom 5:15, 19; 1Co 10:33).

If the covenant is confirmed with God’s people, it must be God’s covenant.

For these reasons, the seven-year covenant in 9:27 is still God’s covenant with Israel.

Articles in this series

(1) The traditional interpretation of Daniel 9 is Historical-Messianic, in which the 490 years is an extension of God’s covenant with Israel.

(2) The 490 years began with Artaxerxes’ decree.  The first 483 years ended with the arrival of the Messiah, namely His baptism in the 15th year of Emperor Tiberius. – CURRENT ARTICLE

(3) The Messiah who is cut off is our Lord Jesus Christ.  The people who destroy the city are the Romans. The prince in Daniel 9:26 is a supernatural force controlling that Empire.

(4) The prophecy’s Poetic Pattern alternates between Jerusalem and the Messiah. In this pattern, Jesus confirms the covenant in Daniel 9:27. – CURRENT ARTICLE

(5) Jesus confirmed God’s covenant for the Seven Last Years by His personal preaching and by sending His disciples to Israel ONLY for a few years after His death.

(6) Daniel 9 promises atonement for sin (9:24) through the killing of the messiah (v26), while he will put a stop to sacrifice (9:27).  In light of the New Testament, this messiah is Jesus Christ.

(7) The Poetic Pattern and the repetition of ideas from verse 26 identify the “complete destruction” in Daniel 9:27c as the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.

(8) The key message of Daniel 9 is that the Messiah will appear within 500 years after Jerusalem is given back to the Jews; before Jerusalem is destroyed in AD 70.

See also, the Summary of all Daniel 9 articles, including the Dispensational Interpretation of Daniel 9.  Another series identifies the Antichrist in the other prophecies of Daniel.