Why I believe
In this world, many forces compel us NOT to believe, but when we open our ‘spiritual eyes’, we see infinite miracles surrounding us. For example:
-
- The universe is infinite. Compared to our galaxy, our world is like a drop of water in the ocean and, compared to the universe, our galaxy is like a grain of sand in the desert.
- But there is no end to the miracles in our bodies and the natural world.
- Time began 13,000 billion years ago and the Bible promises that it will never end.
While surrounded by infinity, mankind focuses on the superficial things of this world. My faith is based on this infinity of miracles but I accept the Bible as God’s message to His creation.
Independent
This website does not reflect the views of any specific denomination or church. I do not have any formal theological qualifications and I do not attend any church. One reason is that I find social contact a bit stressful. But I have always had a love and deep respect for the Bible and, being an analytical person, I like to do these in-depth studies. But I also tend to be very independent, and some conclusions infuriate some people. This year (2024) I will turn 72.
Formal Training
But should a person with no theological training attempt to teach others? Although I have no formal Bible training, I have studied the Bible for many decades and continue daily. I listen to recordings of sermons and discussions whenever I can. I download material from the internet, read books and articles, and try to organize the thoughts carefully.
Perhaps the fact that I have no formal theological training is my greatest asset. After many years of listening to many views, I have concluded that very few people study their Bibles to form their own opinions. In my view, most Christians are indoctrinated from childhood into a particular view of the Bible. True education teaches people HOW to think for themselves, but the enemy has successfully converted our institutions of higher learning into places of indoctrination, teaching people WHAT to think.
Personal
I was born in 1952, qualified as an accountant, and worked as a financial manager in government in Cape Town, South Africa. I have a severely autistic daughter and a very gifted daughter that produced two delightful granddaughters; Anja and Mia.
The Trinity Doctrine
When I began this site, the Trinity doctrine was not an issue for me. But it has since become the main focus of this site.
Objection
I oppose the Trinity doctrine because it teaches that the Father and Son are a single Being with a single mind. Trinitarians often claim that the Trinity exists as three Persons or hypostases, but that is a false claim. This is kept hidden by an abundance of complex arguments but, in the standard Trinity doctrine, the three ‘Persons’ are mere modes of existing as God. They are not distinct ‘Persons’ with distinct minds. (See here)
This Site’s View
If one has to believe the Internet debate, the only alternative to the Trinity doctrine is that Jesus is or was a mere man. In contrast, this site defends the view that dominated during the first four centuries, namely, that the Son:
|
Since the Trinity doctrine uses the term ‘Person’ misleadingly, I prefer to ask whether Father and Son are one of two minds. But is this dispute serious enough to make such a fuss about it? I believe it is. In the first place, the Doctrine of God is the most important doctrine of the church. Furthermore, and it scares me to say because I have not seen anybody else saying this, I believe the Trinity doctrine is the Mark of the Beast. Allow me to explain:
The Beast is Roman.
The Beast of Revelation is a fragment of the Roman Empire. |
The Beast of Revelation is not directly involved in the end-time crisis. In Revelation 13, the Beast gives power to the Land Beast, which gives life to the image of the Beast, which persecutes God’s end-time people (Rev 13:11-15) and puts the Mark of the Beast on its followers (Rev 13:16-17).
Articles on this site show that:
It follows that the 11 horns, including the 11th, are the fragments of that Empire as it disintegrated.
The Trinity Doctrine is Roman.
In the fourth century, in the year 380, Emperor Theodosius made Trinitarian Christianity the State Religion of the Roman Empire. (see here). |
It was not the Council of Constantinople the next year (381), which adopted this doctrine:
Firstly, Theodosius’ Edict is explicitly trinitarian because it identified the ‘one God’ as the Trinity. In contrast, the Council of Constantinople still identified the ‘one God’ as the Father.
Secondly, by the time of the 381 council, Theodosius’ had outlawed all non-Trinitarian views. Therefore, only Trinitarians were able to attend the council.
Already beginning before the council, Theodosius began to ruthlessly eliminate all non-Trinitarian views from the Empire. The point is that Trinitarian Christianity functioned as part of the Roman Empire, with the emperor as its head.“If we ask the question, what was considered to constitute the ultimate authority in doctrine during the period reviewed in these pages, there can be only one answer. The will of the Emperor was the final authority.” (Hanson, p. 849)[/mfn]1“The history of the period shows time and time again that … the general council was the very invention and creation of the Emperor. General councils … were the children of imperial policy and the Emperor was expected to dominate and control them.” (Hanson, p. 855)
Became the Roman Church.
The Church of the Roman Empire became the Roman Church of the Middle Ages. |
In the next (fifth) century, Germanic tribes, who migrated into the empire over the preceding centuries, became so powerful that they divided the Western Empire between them. The Roman Church survived in the West but these new rulers were ‘Arians’. Consequently, the Trinitarian Roman Church was subjected to Arian domination. (Read More)
In the sixth century, Eastern Roman Emperor Justinian sent troops west, uprooted three Western Arian nations, liberated the Roman Church in the West, and set up the Byzantine Papacy, in which the Eastern emperors ruled the Western nations through the Roman Church. This continued for two centuries, transforming the Church into a powerful political organization. (Read More)
In the 8th century, Muslim conquests neutralized the Eastern Roman Empire. The church of the Roman Empire survived in the West without the support of the Roman Empire and became the Roman Church of the Middle Ages. (Read More)
Symbolized by the 11th Horn.
The 11th horn of Daniel’s 4th beast and, therefore, Revelation’s Beast, symbolize the Roman Church. |
This history was predicted by prophecy. As stated, the 4th beast in Daniel 7 symbolizes the Roman Empire. The parallels to history show that:
-
-
- This beast’s first ten horns symbolize the Arian nations of Europe into which the Western Roman Empire fragmented.
- The 11th horn that came out last represents the Roman Church. It was the final fragment of the Empire.
- The three horns uprooted by the 11th horn as it came up symbolize the three Arian nations Justinian conquered.
- That the 11th horn became larger than the others symbolizes the dominance of the Roman Church over nations of Europe during the High Middle Ages. (Read More)
-
Since the Beast of Revelation is Daniel’s 11th horn, The Beast is the Roman Church
The Mark of the Beast is the Trinity doctrine. |
For the following reasons, the Mark of the Beast is the Trinity doctrine:
As stated, the Beast is the 11th Horn in Daniel, which symbolizes the Church of the Roman Empire – namely Trinitarian Christianity – which survived the death of the Roman Empire to become the Roman Church of the Middle Ages. Therefore, the Mark of the Beast is the Mark of the Roman Church. It is not limited to the end-time but something the Roman Church always had.
When the Roman Empire made it its state religion, it was specifically identified as Trinitarian Christianity.
Its birth as a distinct entity, symbolized in Daniel 7 as an 11th horn coming up, uprooting three others, also specifically identifies it as Trinitarian because the three conquered horns were Arian nations and the Roman Empire conquered them to liberate the Trinitarian Church of the Roman Empire
The frequent use of the term ‘worship’ in Revelation 13-14 identifies worship as the key issue in the end-time crisis; who we worship.
The doctrine of God is the most important doctrine of the church. It defines the God of the religion and, therefore, is the boundary between truth and the false.
Thanks for visiting my site. I sincerely hope it helped. If you want, you may contact me at . May the Spirit of God lead you into all truth.
Andries
FOOTNOTES
- 1“The history of the period shows time and time again that … the general council was the very invention and creation of the Emperor. General councils … were the children of imperial policy and the Emperor was expected to dominate and control them.” (Hanson, p. 855)
Thank you so much for all of this
So impressive! Helpful! … Reading about Trinity doctrine, debate over Nicene creed. … just wonderful. Please lets think of ways to share with more people and preserve through time.
I am teaching through Daniel and have so appreciated your explorations of Scripture and your analysis of various points of view. Thanks for lending your brain and Spirit to all of us as we work together in and for the King.
You perform a lot of calculations that encompass Daniel’s 70 weeks prophecy, taking timing at the end 7 years from Jesus’s baptism, up to and beyond Pentecost, thence to Stephen’s stoning.
How do you know that this period of Christ’s ministry was 3½ years – you don’t question it?
Jesus attended Jerusalem for all the Festivals, because he didn’t come to change a ‘jot or tittle but to fulfill’. But he only attend 2 Passover Feasts after his baptism.
There is reference to another Passover in John 6:4, a phrase allegedly inserted by Roman Catholic ‘bishop’ Eusebius. However it is sandwiched between the two ‘leavened bread’ multitude feeding events, at which Pharisees were also present, noting that Passover specifically includes the need to eat unleavened bread for a week.
So, to summarise: multiple use of leavened bread, sandwiching an ‘inserted sentence’ about lowercase ‘passover’, miles from Jerusalem, with Jesus, Jews, and Pharisees all in attendance, non of whom are showing any inclination at either of the miraculous feeding events to be en route to Jerusalem, added to which there are codex that don’t include John 6:4.
Assume this is correct – even if you disagree: what is the impact on the ‘final 7 years’ of Daniel?
Hi Dominic
Yes, I accept the traditional view that Jesus’ ministry on earth was for 3½ years. I know there is uncertainty about this but these things happened a long time ago and nobody knows for sure in what year Jesus was baptized, when He died, or when Stephen was killed. I prefer to take it the other way round, namely that Daniel 9 CONFIRMS that Jesus’ ministry was for 3½ years.
Dispensationalism makes even more precise calculations. They even count DAYS! They are very precise but also very wrong, in my view. I’d rather be more or less right than precisely wrong. What I mean is that the evidence that supports the traditional reading of Daniel 9, as defended by this website, is far too strong to be set aside by the uncertainty over the length of Jesus’ ministry.
Hi Mr. Andries, I accidentally came across your page when i was looking for a topic, It caught my attention and I am interested to read more of your teaching topics. Thank you and would hear more from you. God bless
Good work done. You are very honest,it is good you are not indoctrinated God bless you.I am using your material as a research work to test the doctrines in my church.
Good work mate – you sound exactly like me in every respect!
keep it up my friend
Beloved brother . Greetings to you in His wonderful name…I’m Pastor Prasanna Kumar founder and senior Pastor of Independent Bible Church at Hyderabad city in India. I’m interested in your articles which are really useful for any who serves the Lord to teach and preach in churches and for the personal edification as well.. I really appreciate your contributions to the Christendom. God bless you
Shabbath Shalom to you my friend. Though I do not know your name, yet I consider you as a friend. Thank you for your contributions in sharing about the Sabbath. Looking forward to have a communication with you soon. I am Dick Perlas from Manila, Philippines.
I’m new to this site, John 14:26 for you, your study on Romans 16:25 would interest me.
Andries thank you for a very helpful and informative website with a refreshing and balanced perspective on these Scriptures. It has helped me greatly in settling questions I have had for years resulting from biased perspectives in my early years as a believer. The Lord continue to guide you on this journey and reveal His intents and purposes for believers and thank you for sharing it.
Delighted to hear you are in the same city
I just came across your website today. When I read your bio, I thought I was reading about myself! I have the same ambition that you do, although my path is slightly different. I also have the same theological training (no formal training). However I have been associated with three different denominations. Blessings to you my friend and may the Lord greatly bless you and use you for His glory!
Dear Andries, God bless you for your un-denominational approach, and for taking just the Scriptures. I’m especially blessed by your study of the first 30 years of the Church being a sect of Judaism, from which the Apostle Paul had to bring them into Grace. Tremendous! I’m 56 years old, and I laid aside medicine a few years ago to pastor an independent non-denominational Church in London, based purely on God’s Word.
Thank you so much sir. I been blessed by this website. Today has been my first time visiting this website. My name is Houstien Ntale from Kampala Uganda. I’m a minister in a ministry called word of God fire ministries & our ministry is based on end time message. So I real need your articles. Would like to keep in touch with you always. Thanks a lot.
Hi Houstien, I do not normally reply to comments, but your comment has stirred my heart. I am so thankful to be able to make a contribution to God’s kingdom through you. I just pray that the Lord will lead me to say what is right. Andries
I’m just in love with yo revelations coz they are in harmony with the scriptures may you live longer,amen!
Good information.
About “when the book of Daniel was written”
I didn’t find any reference to Josephus, who in book 11 chapter 8 describes how the priest of Jerusalem show the book of Daniel to Alexander the great in 332 B.C.
Can be read in Ussher’s Annals: http://gospelpedlar.com/articles/Bible/Usher.pdf
page 334 of 1357
sir a pleasant day, thank you so much for this website, I appreciate it much. it’s a big help in my studies. i am a theologian student. look for a book called . the great controversy, i guarantee , that book could help you… God bless..
The articles I have read thus far clearly show that we have much understandings/positions in prophecy in common and that the Lord is using you wonderfully. Your spiritual perceptions are clear, well-balanced and honest, which I really appreciate. You have sieved through the rubbish out there and have rescued truth from them in its unadulterated purity .(The seven heads of Rev.17, the 144000 and the Great multitude, the Seals and the trumpets, etc). Though miles apart, the Spirit of God is leading to his final messages for the finishing of the work. I am a Minister of an independent ministry “Truth for the Final Generation” in the island of Barbados in the Caribbean. Keep up the good work.
i agree with you Sir. Praise the God of Israel. Baruch He Shem.